Comparison of survival, palliation, and quality of life with three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: This randomised trial compared three chemotherapy regimens in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, in terms of their effect on overall and progression-free survival; other endpoints included toxicity, symptom palliation, and quality of life. METHODS: 905 patients were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maughan, T, James, R, Kerr, D, Ledermann, J, McArdle, C, Seymour, M, Cohen, D, Hopwood, P, Johnston, C, Stephens, R
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2002
_version_ 1797080390617268224
author Maughan, T
James, R
Kerr, D
Ledermann, J
McArdle, C
Seymour, M
Cohen, D
Hopwood, P
Johnston, C
Stephens, R
author_facet Maughan, T
James, R
Kerr, D
Ledermann, J
McArdle, C
Seymour, M
Cohen, D
Hopwood, P
Johnston, C
Stephens, R
author_sort Maughan, T
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: This randomised trial compared three chemotherapy regimens in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, in terms of their effect on overall and progression-free survival; other endpoints included toxicity, symptom palliation, and quality of life. METHODS: 905 patients were randomly assigned the de Gramont regimen (n=303; folinic acid 200 mg/m(2), fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m(2), and infusion 600 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2, repeated every 14 days), the Lokich regimen (n=301; protracted venous infusion of fluorouracil 300 mg/m(2) daily), or raltitrexed (n=301; 3 mg/m(2) intravenously every 21 days). Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Median follow-up of survivors was 67 weeks. For the de Gramont, Lokich, and raltitrexed groups, respectively, median survival was 294, 302, and 266 days. The hazard ratios for overall survival were 0.88 (95% CI 0.70-1.12, p=0.17) for de Gramont versus Lokich, and 0.99 (0.79-1.25, p=0.94) for de Gramont versus raltitrexed. An increase in treatment-related deaths was seen on raltitrexed (de Gramont one, Lokich two, raltitrexed 18) due to combined gastrointestinal and haematological toxicity. Patients' assessment of quality of life showed that raltitrexed was inferior to the fluorouracil-based regimens, especially in terms of palliation and functioning. INTERPRETATION: The deGramont and Lokich regimens were similar in terms of survival, quality of life, and response rates. The Lokich regimen was associated with more central line complications and hand-foot syndrome. Raltitrexed showed similar response rates and overall survival to the de Gramont regimen and was easier to administer, but resulted in greater toxicity and inferior quality of life.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:59:20Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:892df933-f5a7-4553-9c18-3a4663035c70
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:59:20Z
publishDate 2002
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:892df933-f5a7-4553-9c18-3a4663035c702022-03-26T22:22:40ZComparison of survival, palliation, and quality of life with three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:892df933-f5a7-4553-9c18-3a4663035c70EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2002Maughan, TJames, RKerr, DLedermann, JMcArdle, CSeymour, MCohen, DHopwood, PJohnston, CStephens, R BACKGROUND: This randomised trial compared three chemotherapy regimens in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, in terms of their effect on overall and progression-free survival; other endpoints included toxicity, symptom palliation, and quality of life. METHODS: 905 patients were randomly assigned the de Gramont regimen (n=303; folinic acid 200 mg/m(2), fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m(2), and infusion 600 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2, repeated every 14 days), the Lokich regimen (n=301; protracted venous infusion of fluorouracil 300 mg/m(2) daily), or raltitrexed (n=301; 3 mg/m(2) intravenously every 21 days). Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Median follow-up of survivors was 67 weeks. For the de Gramont, Lokich, and raltitrexed groups, respectively, median survival was 294, 302, and 266 days. The hazard ratios for overall survival were 0.88 (95% CI 0.70-1.12, p=0.17) for de Gramont versus Lokich, and 0.99 (0.79-1.25, p=0.94) for de Gramont versus raltitrexed. An increase in treatment-related deaths was seen on raltitrexed (de Gramont one, Lokich two, raltitrexed 18) due to combined gastrointestinal and haematological toxicity. Patients' assessment of quality of life showed that raltitrexed was inferior to the fluorouracil-based regimens, especially in terms of palliation and functioning. INTERPRETATION: The deGramont and Lokich regimens were similar in terms of survival, quality of life, and response rates. The Lokich regimen was associated with more central line complications and hand-foot syndrome. Raltitrexed showed similar response rates and overall survival to the de Gramont regimen and was easier to administer, but resulted in greater toxicity and inferior quality of life.
spellingShingle Maughan, T
James, R
Kerr, D
Ledermann, J
McArdle, C
Seymour, M
Cohen, D
Hopwood, P
Johnston, C
Stephens, R
Comparison of survival, palliation, and quality of life with three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial.
title Comparison of survival, palliation, and quality of life with three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial.
title_full Comparison of survival, palliation, and quality of life with three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial.
title_fullStr Comparison of survival, palliation, and quality of life with three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of survival, palliation, and quality of life with three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial.
title_short Comparison of survival, palliation, and quality of life with three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial.
title_sort comparison of survival palliation and quality of life with three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer a multicentre randomised trial
work_keys_str_mv AT maughant comparisonofsurvivalpalliationandqualityoflifewiththreechemotherapyregimensinmetastaticcolorectalcanceramulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT jamesr comparisonofsurvivalpalliationandqualityoflifewiththreechemotherapyregimensinmetastaticcolorectalcanceramulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT kerrd comparisonofsurvivalpalliationandqualityoflifewiththreechemotherapyregimensinmetastaticcolorectalcanceramulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT ledermannj comparisonofsurvivalpalliationandqualityoflifewiththreechemotherapyregimensinmetastaticcolorectalcanceramulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT mcardlec comparisonofsurvivalpalliationandqualityoflifewiththreechemotherapyregimensinmetastaticcolorectalcanceramulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT seymourm comparisonofsurvivalpalliationandqualityoflifewiththreechemotherapyregimensinmetastaticcolorectalcanceramulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT cohend comparisonofsurvivalpalliationandqualityoflifewiththreechemotherapyregimensinmetastaticcolorectalcanceramulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT hopwoodp comparisonofsurvivalpalliationandqualityoflifewiththreechemotherapyregimensinmetastaticcolorectalcanceramulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT johnstonc comparisonofsurvivalpalliationandqualityoflifewiththreechemotherapyregimensinmetastaticcolorectalcanceramulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT stephensr comparisonofsurvivalpalliationandqualityoflifewiththreechemotherapyregimensinmetastaticcolorectalcanceramulticentrerandomisedtrial