Cost-effectiveness of bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery grafts at ten years
<p><strong>Objectives:</strong> Using bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been suggested to improve survival compared to CABG using single internal thoracic arteries (SITA) for patients with advanced coronary artery disease. We...
Główni autorzy: | Little, M, Gray, A, Altman, DG, Benedetto, U, Flather, M, Gerry, S, Lees, B, Murphy, J, Gaudino, M, Taggart, D |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Język: | English |
Wydane: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Podobne zapisy
-
Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.
od: Taggart, D, i wsp.
Wydane: (2016) -
Five-year costs from a randomised comparison of bilateral and single internal thoracic artery grafts
od: Little, M, i wsp.
Wydane: (2019) -
Bilateral versus single internal thoracic coronary artery bypass grafting: the ART RCT
od: Marcus Flather, i wsp.
Wydane: (2023-10-01) -
Associations between adding a radial artery graft to single and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts and outcomes. Insights from the Arterial Revascularization Trial
od: Taggart, D, i wsp.
Wydane: (2017) -
One-year costs of bilateral or single internal mammary grafts in the Arterial Revascularisation Trial
od: Gray, A, i wsp.
Wydane: (2017)