Intraosseous pressure during loading and with vascular occlusion

<p>We studied subchondral intraosseous pressure (IOP) in an animal model during loading and with vascular occlusion. We explored bone compartmentalisation by saline injection.</p> <br/> <p>Needles were placed in the femoral condyle and upper tibia of 5 anaesthetised rabbits...

全面介紹

書目詳細資料
Main Authors: Beverly, M, Mellon, S, Kennedy, J, Murray, D
格式: Journal article
出版: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2018
_version_ 1826283613083140096
author Beverly, M
Mellon, S
Kennedy, J
Murray, D
author_facet Beverly, M
Mellon, S
Kennedy, J
Murray, D
author_sort Beverly, M
collection OXFORD
description <p>We studied subchondral intraosseous pressure (IOP) in an animal model during loading and with vascular occlusion. We explored bone compartmentalisation by saline injection.</p> <br/> <p>Needles were placed in the femoral condyle and upper tibia of 5 anaesthetised rabbits and connected to pressure recorders. The limb was loaded with and without proximal vascular occlusion. An additional subject had simultaneous triple recordings at the femoral head, femoral condyle and proximal tibia. In a further subject saline injections at three sites were carried out alternately.</p> <br/> <p>Loading alone caused a rise in subchondral IOP from 11.7mmHg (SD 7.1mmHg) to 17.9mmHg (SD 8.1mmHg) p&lt;0.0002. During arterial occlusion IOP fell to 5.3mmHg (SD 4.1mmHg) then with loading there was a small rise to 7.6mmHg (SD 4.5mmHg) p&lt;0.002. During venous occlusion IOP rose to 20.2mmHg (SD 5.8mmHg) and with loading there was a further rise to 26.3mmHg (SD 6.3mmHg) p&lt;0.003. The effects were present at three different sites along the limb simultaneously. Saline injections showed pressure transmitted throughout the length of the femur but not across the knee joint.</p> <br/> <p>This is the first study to report changes in IOP in vivo during loading and with combinations of vascular occlusion and loading. IOP is not a constant but is reduced during proximal arterial occlusion and increased with proximal venous occlusion. Whatever the perfusion state, in vivo load is transferred partly by hydraulic pressure. We suggest that joints act as hydraulic pressure barriers. An understanding of subchondral physiology may be important in understanding osteoarthritis and other bone diseases.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T01:01:30Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:89e46b46-1ca5-4782-9f5c-a0d55c05e574
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T01:01:30Z
publishDate 2018
publisher British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:89e46b46-1ca5-4782-9f5c-a0d55c05e5742022-03-26T22:27:38ZIntraosseous pressure during loading and with vascular occlusionJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:89e46b46-1ca5-4782-9f5c-a0d55c05e574Symplectic Elements at OxfordBritish Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery2018Beverly, MMellon, SKennedy, JMurray, D <p>We studied subchondral intraosseous pressure (IOP) in an animal model during loading and with vascular occlusion. We explored bone compartmentalisation by saline injection.</p> <br/> <p>Needles were placed in the femoral condyle and upper tibia of 5 anaesthetised rabbits and connected to pressure recorders. The limb was loaded with and without proximal vascular occlusion. An additional subject had simultaneous triple recordings at the femoral head, femoral condyle and proximal tibia. In a further subject saline injections at three sites were carried out alternately.</p> <br/> <p>Loading alone caused a rise in subchondral IOP from 11.7mmHg (SD 7.1mmHg) to 17.9mmHg (SD 8.1mmHg) p&lt;0.0002. During arterial occlusion IOP fell to 5.3mmHg (SD 4.1mmHg) then with loading there was a small rise to 7.6mmHg (SD 4.5mmHg) p&lt;0.002. During venous occlusion IOP rose to 20.2mmHg (SD 5.8mmHg) and with loading there was a further rise to 26.3mmHg (SD 6.3mmHg) p&lt;0.003. The effects were present at three different sites along the limb simultaneously. Saline injections showed pressure transmitted throughout the length of the femur but not across the knee joint.</p> <br/> <p>This is the first study to report changes in IOP in vivo during loading and with combinations of vascular occlusion and loading. IOP is not a constant but is reduced during proximal arterial occlusion and increased with proximal venous occlusion. Whatever the perfusion state, in vivo load is transferred partly by hydraulic pressure. We suggest that joints act as hydraulic pressure barriers. An understanding of subchondral physiology may be important in understanding osteoarthritis and other bone diseases.</p>
spellingShingle Beverly, M
Mellon, S
Kennedy, J
Murray, D
Intraosseous pressure during loading and with vascular occlusion
title Intraosseous pressure during loading and with vascular occlusion
title_full Intraosseous pressure during loading and with vascular occlusion
title_fullStr Intraosseous pressure during loading and with vascular occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Intraosseous pressure during loading and with vascular occlusion
title_short Intraosseous pressure during loading and with vascular occlusion
title_sort intraosseous pressure during loading and with vascular occlusion
work_keys_str_mv AT beverlym intraosseouspressureduringloadingandwithvascularocclusion
AT mellons intraosseouspressureduringloadingandwithvascularocclusion
AT kennedyj intraosseouspressureduringloadingandwithvascularocclusion
AT murrayd intraosseouspressureduringloadingandwithvascularocclusion