Rethinking the epistemic case against epistocracy
In this article, I focus on arguments which suggest that disenfranchising persons on the grounds of incompetence is likely to produce epistemically sub-optimal decisions. I suggest three ways in which such arguments can be strengthened. First, I argue that they can be untethered from the controversi...
Main Author: | Bhatia, U |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
Routledge
2018
|
Similar Items
-
Epistocracy and constitutions
by: Bhatia, U
Published: (2019) -
The Incompatibility of Moral Relativism and Brennan’s Argument for Epistocracy
by: Donovan van der Haak
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Developing Gadamerian Virtues Against Epistemic Injustice: The Epistemic and Hermeneutic Dimensions of Ethics
by: Haley Burke
Published: (2022-07-01) -
Epistemic Theodicy, Epistemic Evil, and Epistemic Responsibility
by: Vojko Strahovnik
Published: (2023-10-01) -
Violence and epistemic injustice against indigenous communities in Colombia: epistemic agency, participation and territory
by: Juan David Franco Daza
Published: (2022-07-01)