Large-scale comparison of Liberase HI and collagenase NB1 utilized for human islet isolation.

For more than a decade Liberase HI was commonly used as the standard enzyme blend for clinical human islet isolation until enforced replacement by collagenase NB1 (NB1). This change resulted initially in a reduction in islet isolation outcome and transplant activities worldwide. This retrospective s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brandhorst, H, Friberg, A, Nilsson, B, Andersson, H, Felldin, M, Foss, A, Salmela, K, Tibell, A, Tufveson, G, Korsgren, O, Brandhorst, D
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2010
_version_ 1797106501559517184
author Brandhorst, H
Friberg, A
Friberg, A
Nilsson, B
Nilsson, B
Andersson, H
Andersson, H
Felldin, M
Felldin, M
Foss, A
Foss, A
Salmela, K
Salmela, K
Tibell, A
Tibell, A
Tufveson, G
Tufveson, G
Korsgren, O
Korsgren, O
Brandhorst, D
Brandhorst, D
author_facet Brandhorst, H
Friberg, A
Friberg, A
Nilsson, B
Nilsson, B
Andersson, H
Andersson, H
Felldin, M
Felldin, M
Foss, A
Foss, A
Salmela, K
Salmela, K
Tibell, A
Tibell, A
Tufveson, G
Tufveson, G
Korsgren, O
Korsgren, O
Brandhorst, D
Brandhorst, D
author_sort Brandhorst, H
collection OXFORD
description For more than a decade Liberase HI was commonly used as the standard enzyme blend for clinical human islet isolation until enforced replacement by collagenase NB1 (NB1). This change resulted initially in a reduction in islet isolation outcome and transplant activities worldwide. This retrospective study was initiated to compare the efficiency of NB1 premium grade with Liberase in 197 human islet isolations. All pancreata were processed between January 2006 and June 2008 utilizing the same procedures for isolation and quality assessment except the administration of preselected lots of either Liberase (n = 101) or NB1 (n = 96). Utilizing Liberase, significantly more digested tissue and purified islet yield was produced compared to NB1. In contrast, the use of NB1 was associated with significantly higher purity and glucose stimulation index during dynamic perifusion. The expression of proinflammatory markers was almost identical except tissue factor expression, which was higher after utilization of Liberase. No difference was found in the percentage of pancreata fulfilling the criteria for clinical islet transplantation. The results suggest that Liberase is more efficient for pancreas dissociation than collagenase NB1 but seems to be more harmful to exocrine cells and islet tissue.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:01:31Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:8a8461de-fc2e-483b-8c16-783ff3a95b5d
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:01:31Z
publishDate 2010
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:8a8461de-fc2e-483b-8c16-783ff3a95b5d2022-03-29T17:17:54ZLarge-scale comparison of Liberase HI and collagenase NB1 utilized for human islet isolation.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8a8461de-fc2e-483b-8c16-783ff3a95b5dEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2010Brandhorst, HFriberg, AFriberg, ANilsson, BNilsson, BAndersson, HAndersson, HFelldin, MFelldin, MFoss, AFoss, ASalmela, KSalmela, KTibell, ATibell, ATufveson, GTufveson, GKorsgren, OKorsgren, OBrandhorst, DBrandhorst, DFor more than a decade Liberase HI was commonly used as the standard enzyme blend for clinical human islet isolation until enforced replacement by collagenase NB1 (NB1). This change resulted initially in a reduction in islet isolation outcome and transplant activities worldwide. This retrospective study was initiated to compare the efficiency of NB1 premium grade with Liberase in 197 human islet isolations. All pancreata were processed between January 2006 and June 2008 utilizing the same procedures for isolation and quality assessment except the administration of preselected lots of either Liberase (n = 101) or NB1 (n = 96). Utilizing Liberase, significantly more digested tissue and purified islet yield was produced compared to NB1. In contrast, the use of NB1 was associated with significantly higher purity and glucose stimulation index during dynamic perifusion. The expression of proinflammatory markers was almost identical except tissue factor expression, which was higher after utilization of Liberase. No difference was found in the percentage of pancreata fulfilling the criteria for clinical islet transplantation. The results suggest that Liberase is more efficient for pancreas dissociation than collagenase NB1 but seems to be more harmful to exocrine cells and islet tissue.
spellingShingle Brandhorst, H
Friberg, A
Friberg, A
Nilsson, B
Nilsson, B
Andersson, H
Andersson, H
Felldin, M
Felldin, M
Foss, A
Foss, A
Salmela, K
Salmela, K
Tibell, A
Tibell, A
Tufveson, G
Tufveson, G
Korsgren, O
Korsgren, O
Brandhorst, D
Brandhorst, D
Large-scale comparison of Liberase HI and collagenase NB1 utilized for human islet isolation.
title Large-scale comparison of Liberase HI and collagenase NB1 utilized for human islet isolation.
title_full Large-scale comparison of Liberase HI and collagenase NB1 utilized for human islet isolation.
title_fullStr Large-scale comparison of Liberase HI and collagenase NB1 utilized for human islet isolation.
title_full_unstemmed Large-scale comparison of Liberase HI and collagenase NB1 utilized for human islet isolation.
title_short Large-scale comparison of Liberase HI and collagenase NB1 utilized for human islet isolation.
title_sort large scale comparison of liberase hi and collagenase nb1 utilized for human islet isolation
work_keys_str_mv AT brandhorsth largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT friberga largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT friberga largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT nilssonb largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT nilssonb largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT anderssonh largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT anderssonh largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT felldinm largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT felldinm largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT fossa largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT fossa largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT salmelak largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT salmelak largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT tibella largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT tibella largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT tufvesong largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT tufvesong largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT korsgreno largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT korsgreno largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT brandhorstd largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation
AT brandhorstd largescalecomparisonofliberasehiandcollagenasenb1utilizedforhumanisletisolation