Anarchist Ambivalence: politics and violence in the thought of Bakunin, Tolstoy and Kropotkin

The question of violence is invariably a matter of controversy and dispute for anarchists.[Pauli 2015: 142; Gelderloos 2007, 2015; Graeber 2009:222-228; Miller 1984: 109-123] Anarchist means should prefigure their political and ethical ends - and anarchy will be non-coercive. [Miller 1984:109; Gr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frazer, E, Hutchings, K
Format: Journal article
Published: SAGE Publications 2015
_version_ 1797080803987947520
author Frazer, E
Hutchings, K
author_facet Frazer, E
Hutchings, K
author_sort Frazer, E
collection OXFORD
description The question of violence is invariably a matter of controversy and dispute for anarchists.[Pauli 2015: 142; Gelderloos 2007, 2015; Graeber 2009:222-228; Miller 1984: 109-123] Anarchist means should prefigure their political and ethical ends - and anarchy will be non-coercive. [Miller 1984:109; Graeber 2009:222] Reception of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1809-1865) often focused on his aversion to violent revolution, appropriating him into the category of 'utopian' thinkers, in contrast to Marxist realism. Tolstoy's theory of state coercion can be traced to Proudhon [Rivett 1988: 31; Bartlett 2013: 143]. Subsequently there have been engagements between anarchism and pacifism in the thought and practice of Mohandas Gandhi [1869-1948], who was significantly influenced by Tolstoy. But practices of non-violence have recently become contentious among anarchists.[Pauli 2015: 142-3; Gelderloos 2007, 2015]
first_indexed 2024-03-07T01:05:26Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:8b2bd584-f920-49cf-a38e-337dffcf929e
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T01:05:26Z
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:8b2bd584-f920-49cf-a38e-337dffcf929e2022-03-26T22:36:22ZAnarchist Ambivalence: politics and violence in the thought of Bakunin, Tolstoy and KropotkinJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8b2bd584-f920-49cf-a38e-337dffcf929eSymplectic Elements at OxfordSAGE Publications2015Frazer, EHutchings, KThe question of violence is invariably a matter of controversy and dispute for anarchists.[Pauli 2015: 142; Gelderloos 2007, 2015; Graeber 2009:222-228; Miller 1984: 109-123] Anarchist means should prefigure their political and ethical ends - and anarchy will be non-coercive. [Miller 1984:109; Graeber 2009:222] Reception of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1809-1865) often focused on his aversion to violent revolution, appropriating him into the category of 'utopian' thinkers, in contrast to Marxist realism. Tolstoy's theory of state coercion can be traced to Proudhon [Rivett 1988: 31; Bartlett 2013: 143]. Subsequently there have been engagements between anarchism and pacifism in the thought and practice of Mohandas Gandhi [1869-1948], who was significantly influenced by Tolstoy. But practices of non-violence have recently become contentious among anarchists.[Pauli 2015: 142-3; Gelderloos 2007, 2015]
spellingShingle Frazer, E
Hutchings, K
Anarchist Ambivalence: politics and violence in the thought of Bakunin, Tolstoy and Kropotkin
title Anarchist Ambivalence: politics and violence in the thought of Bakunin, Tolstoy and Kropotkin
title_full Anarchist Ambivalence: politics and violence in the thought of Bakunin, Tolstoy and Kropotkin
title_fullStr Anarchist Ambivalence: politics and violence in the thought of Bakunin, Tolstoy and Kropotkin
title_full_unstemmed Anarchist Ambivalence: politics and violence in the thought of Bakunin, Tolstoy and Kropotkin
title_short Anarchist Ambivalence: politics and violence in the thought of Bakunin, Tolstoy and Kropotkin
title_sort anarchist ambivalence politics and violence in the thought of bakunin tolstoy and kropotkin
work_keys_str_mv AT frazere anarchistambivalencepoliticsandviolenceinthethoughtofbakunintolstoyandkropotkin
AT hutchingsk anarchistambivalencepoliticsandviolenceinthethoughtofbakunintolstoyandkropotkin