Contiguity and the outcome density bias in action-outcome contingency judgements.

In cause-outcome contingency judgement tasks, judgements often reflect the actual contingency but are also influenced by the overall probability of the outcome, P(O). Action-outcome instrumental learning tasks can foster a pattern in which judgements of positive contingencies become less positive as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vallée-Tourangeau, F, Murphy, R, Baker, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2005
_version_ 1797080889556992000
author Vallée-Tourangeau, F
Murphy, R
Baker, A
author_facet Vallée-Tourangeau, F
Murphy, R
Baker, A
author_sort Vallée-Tourangeau, F
collection OXFORD
description In cause-outcome contingency judgement tasks, judgements often reflect the actual contingency but are also influenced by the overall probability of the outcome, P(O). Action-outcome instrumental learning tasks can foster a pattern in which judgements of positive contingencies become less positive as P(O) increases. Variable contiguity between the action and the outcome may produce this bias. Experiment 1 recorded judgements of positive contingencies that were largely uninfluenced by P(O) using an immediate contiguity procedure. Experiment 2 directly compared variable versus constant contiguity. The predicted interaction between contiguity and P(O) was observed for positive contingencies. These results stress the sensitivity of the causal learning mechanism to temporal contiguity.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T01:06:43Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:8b97dbed-72ef-454c-862b-ed6afbd4eb11
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T01:06:43Z
publishDate 2005
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:8b97dbed-72ef-454c-862b-ed6afbd4eb112022-03-26T22:39:05ZContiguity and the outcome density bias in action-outcome contingency judgements.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8b97dbed-72ef-454c-862b-ed6afbd4eb11EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2005Vallée-Tourangeau, FMurphy, RBaker, AIn cause-outcome contingency judgement tasks, judgements often reflect the actual contingency but are also influenced by the overall probability of the outcome, P(O). Action-outcome instrumental learning tasks can foster a pattern in which judgements of positive contingencies become less positive as P(O) increases. Variable contiguity between the action and the outcome may produce this bias. Experiment 1 recorded judgements of positive contingencies that were largely uninfluenced by P(O) using an immediate contiguity procedure. Experiment 2 directly compared variable versus constant contiguity. The predicted interaction between contiguity and P(O) was observed for positive contingencies. These results stress the sensitivity of the causal learning mechanism to temporal contiguity.
spellingShingle Vallée-Tourangeau, F
Murphy, R
Baker, A
Contiguity and the outcome density bias in action-outcome contingency judgements.
title Contiguity and the outcome density bias in action-outcome contingency judgements.
title_full Contiguity and the outcome density bias in action-outcome contingency judgements.
title_fullStr Contiguity and the outcome density bias in action-outcome contingency judgements.
title_full_unstemmed Contiguity and the outcome density bias in action-outcome contingency judgements.
title_short Contiguity and the outcome density bias in action-outcome contingency judgements.
title_sort contiguity and the outcome density bias in action outcome contingency judgements
work_keys_str_mv AT valleetourangeauf contiguityandtheoutcomedensitybiasinactionoutcomecontingencyjudgements
AT murphyr contiguityandtheoutcomedensitybiasinactionoutcomecontingencyjudgements
AT bakera contiguityandtheoutcomedensitybiasinactionoutcomecontingencyjudgements