Effect of Delta variant on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK

The effectiveness of the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 vaccines against new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections requires continuous re-evaluation, given the increasingly dominant B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of these vaccines...

Volledige beschrijving

Bibliografische gegevens
Hoofdauteurs: Pouwels, KB, Pritchard, E, Matthews, PC, Stoesser, N, Eyre, DW, Vihta, K-D, House, T, Hay, J, Bell, JI, Newton, JN, Farrar, J, Crook, D, Cook, D, Rourke, E, Studley, R, Peto, TEA, Diamond, I, Walker, AS
Formaat: Journal article
Taal:English
Gepubliceerd in: Springer Nature 2021
_version_ 1826307652320231424
author Pouwels, KB
Pritchard, E
Matthews, PC
Stoesser, N
Eyre, DW
Vihta, K-D
House, T
Hay, J
Bell, JI
Newton, JN
Farrar, J
Crook, D
Cook, D
Rourke, E
Studley, R
Peto, TEA
Diamond, I
Walker, AS
author_facet Pouwels, KB
Pritchard, E
Matthews, PC
Stoesser, N
Eyre, DW
Vihta, K-D
House, T
Hay, J
Bell, JI
Newton, JN
Farrar, J
Crook, D
Cook, D
Rourke, E
Studley, R
Peto, TEA
Diamond, I
Walker, AS
author_sort Pouwels, KB
collection OXFORD
description The effectiveness of the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 vaccines against new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections requires continuous re-evaluation, given the increasingly dominant B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of these vaccines in a large, community-based survey of randomly selected households across the United Kingdom. We found that the effectiveness of BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 against infections (new polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive cases) with symptoms or high viral burden is reduced with the B.1.617.2 variant (absolute difference of 10–13% for BNT162b2 and 16% for ChAdOx1) compared to the B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant. The effectiveness of two doses remains at least as great as protection afforded by prior natural infection. The dynamics of immunity after second doses differed significantly between BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1, with greater initial effectiveness against new PCR-positive cases but faster declines in protection against high viral burden and symptomatic infection with BNT162b2. There was no evidence that effectiveness varied by dosing interval, but protection was higher in vaccinated individuals after a prior infection and in younger adults. With B.1.617.2, infections occurring after two vaccinations had similar peak viral burden as those in unvaccinated individuals. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination still reduces new infections, but effectiveness and attenuation of peak viral burden are reduced with B.1.617.2.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:06:21Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:8bcc77f7-d3c7-4df0-a807-42cf5bb46ddb
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:06:21Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Nature
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:8bcc77f7-d3c7-4df0-a807-42cf5bb46ddb2022-05-05T11:04:26ZEffect of Delta variant on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UKJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8bcc77f7-d3c7-4df0-a807-42cf5bb46ddbEnglishSymplectic ElementsSpringer Nature2021Pouwels, KBPritchard, EMatthews, PCStoesser, NEyre, DWVihta, K-DHouse, THay, JBell, JINewton, JNFarrar, JCrook, DCook, DRourke, EStudley, RPeto, TEADiamond, IWalker, ASThe effectiveness of the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 vaccines against new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections requires continuous re-evaluation, given the increasingly dominant B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of these vaccines in a large, community-based survey of randomly selected households across the United Kingdom. We found that the effectiveness of BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 against infections (new polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive cases) with symptoms or high viral burden is reduced with the B.1.617.2 variant (absolute difference of 10–13% for BNT162b2 and 16% for ChAdOx1) compared to the B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant. The effectiveness of two doses remains at least as great as protection afforded by prior natural infection. The dynamics of immunity after second doses differed significantly between BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1, with greater initial effectiveness against new PCR-positive cases but faster declines in protection against high viral burden and symptomatic infection with BNT162b2. There was no evidence that effectiveness varied by dosing interval, but protection was higher in vaccinated individuals after a prior infection and in younger adults. With B.1.617.2, infections occurring after two vaccinations had similar peak viral burden as those in unvaccinated individuals. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination still reduces new infections, but effectiveness and attenuation of peak viral burden are reduced with B.1.617.2.
spellingShingle Pouwels, KB
Pritchard, E
Matthews, PC
Stoesser, N
Eyre, DW
Vihta, K-D
House, T
Hay, J
Bell, JI
Newton, JN
Farrar, J
Crook, D
Cook, D
Rourke, E
Studley, R
Peto, TEA
Diamond, I
Walker, AS
Effect of Delta variant on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK
title Effect of Delta variant on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK
title_full Effect of Delta variant on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK
title_fullStr Effect of Delta variant on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Delta variant on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK
title_short Effect of Delta variant on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK
title_sort effect of delta variant on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new sars cov 2 infections in the uk
work_keys_str_mv AT pouwelskb effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT pritcharde effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT matthewspc effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT stoessern effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT eyredw effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT vihtakd effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT houset effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT hayj effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT bellji effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT newtonjn effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT farrarj effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT crookd effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT cookd effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT rourkee effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT studleyr effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT petotea effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT diamondi effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk
AT walkeras effectofdeltavariantonviralburdenandvaccineeffectivenessagainstnewsarscov2infectionsintheuk