Short- and long-term warming effects of methane may affect the cost-effectiveness of mitigation policies and benefits of low-meat diets
Methane’s short atmospheric life has important implications for the design of global climate change mitigation policies in agriculture. Three different agricultural economic models are used to explore how short- and long-term warming effects of methane can affect the cost-effectiveness of mitigation...
Main Authors: | Pérez-Domínguez, I, del Prado, A, Mittenzwei, K, Hristov, J, Frank, S, Tabeau, A, Witzke, P, Havlik, P, van Meijl, H, Lynch, J, Stehfest, E, Pardo, G, Barreiro-Hurle, J, Koopman, JFL, Jose Sanz-Sanchez, M |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Nature
2021
|
Similar Items
-
Comparing impacts of climate change and mitigation on global agriculture by 2050
by: Hans van Meijl, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Methane reductions to moderate the global warming effects
by: Tibor Török, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01) -
How much multilateralism do we need? Effectiveness of unilateral agricultural mitigation efforts in the global context
by: Stefan Frank, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Effect of warm-smoking on total microbial count of meat products
by: A Javadi, et al.
Published: (2007-11-01) -
Converse effects of warming and reclamation on methane uptake in alpine meadows
by: Jing Huang, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01)