Revisiting the basic reproductive number for malaria and its implications for malaria control

The prospects for the success of malaria control depend, in part, on the basic reproductive number for malaria, R0. Here, we estimate R0 in a novel way for 121 African populations, and thereby increase the number of R0 estimates for malaria by an order of magnitude. The estimates range from around o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Smith, D, McKenzie, F, Snow, R, Hay, S
Other Authors: Grenfell, B
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2007
Subjects:
_version_ 1797081008301932544
author Smith, D
McKenzie, F
Snow, R
Hay, S
author2 Grenfell, B
author_facet Grenfell, B
Smith, D
McKenzie, F
Snow, R
Hay, S
author_sort Smith, D
collection OXFORD
description The prospects for the success of malaria control depend, in part, on the basic reproductive number for malaria, R0. Here, we estimate R0 in a novel way for 121 African populations, and thereby increase the number of R0 estimates for malaria by an order of magnitude. The estimates range from around one to more than 3,000. We also consider malaria transmission and control in finite human populations, of size H. We show that classic formulas approximate the expected number of mosquitoes that could trace infection back to one mosquito after one parasite generation, Z0(H), but they overestimate the expected number of infected humans per infected human, R0(H). Heterogeneous biting increases R0 and, as we show, Z0(H), but we also show that it sometimes reduces R0(H); those who are bitten most both infect many vectors and absorb infectious bites. The large range of R0 estimates strongly supports the long-held notion that malaria control presents variable challenges across its transmission spectrum. In populations where R0 is highest, malaria control will require multiple, integrated methods that target those who are bitten most. Therefore, strategic planning for malaria control should consider R0, the spatial scale of transmission, human population density, and heterogeneous biting.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T01:08:24Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:8c23781f-78ab-4fb5-8d54-727bf8b303de
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T01:08:24Z
publishDate 2007
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:8c23781f-78ab-4fb5-8d54-727bf8b303de2022-03-26T22:42:46ZRevisiting the basic reproductive number for malaria and its implications for malaria controlJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8c23781f-78ab-4fb5-8d54-727bf8b303deZoological sciencesTropical medicineEpidemiologyMalariaEnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetPublic Library of Science2007Smith, DMcKenzie, FSnow, RHay, SGrenfell, BThe prospects for the success of malaria control depend, in part, on the basic reproductive number for malaria, R0. Here, we estimate R0 in a novel way for 121 African populations, and thereby increase the number of R0 estimates for malaria by an order of magnitude. The estimates range from around one to more than 3,000. We also consider malaria transmission and control in finite human populations, of size H. We show that classic formulas approximate the expected number of mosquitoes that could trace infection back to one mosquito after one parasite generation, Z0(H), but they overestimate the expected number of infected humans per infected human, R0(H). Heterogeneous biting increases R0 and, as we show, Z0(H), but we also show that it sometimes reduces R0(H); those who are bitten most both infect many vectors and absorb infectious bites. The large range of R0 estimates strongly supports the long-held notion that malaria control presents variable challenges across its transmission spectrum. In populations where R0 is highest, malaria control will require multiple, integrated methods that target those who are bitten most. Therefore, strategic planning for malaria control should consider R0, the spatial scale of transmission, human population density, and heterogeneous biting.
spellingShingle Zoological sciences
Tropical medicine
Epidemiology
Malaria
Smith, D
McKenzie, F
Snow, R
Hay, S
Revisiting the basic reproductive number for malaria and its implications for malaria control
title Revisiting the basic reproductive number for malaria and its implications for malaria control
title_full Revisiting the basic reproductive number for malaria and its implications for malaria control
title_fullStr Revisiting the basic reproductive number for malaria and its implications for malaria control
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the basic reproductive number for malaria and its implications for malaria control
title_short Revisiting the basic reproductive number for malaria and its implications for malaria control
title_sort revisiting the basic reproductive number for malaria and its implications for malaria control
topic Zoological sciences
Tropical medicine
Epidemiology
Malaria
work_keys_str_mv AT smithd revisitingthebasicreproductivenumberformalariaanditsimplicationsformalariacontrol
AT mckenzief revisitingthebasicreproductivenumberformalariaanditsimplicationsformalariacontrol
AT snowr revisitingthebasicreproductivenumberformalariaanditsimplicationsformalariacontrol
AT hays revisitingthebasicreproductivenumberformalariaanditsimplicationsformalariacontrol