Rasch scoring of outcomes of total hip replacement.

We examined whether there are advantages in terms of outcome assessment of using Rasch methods of scoring the 12-item Oxford Hip Score questionnaire over conventionally summed scores. Data were collected on patients receiving total hip replacement surgery. Three patient groups were created according...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fitzpatrick, R, Norquist, J, Dawson, J, Jenkinson, C
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2003
_version_ 1797081030815907840
author Fitzpatrick, R
Norquist, J
Dawson, J
Jenkinson, C
author_facet Fitzpatrick, R
Norquist, J
Dawson, J
Jenkinson, C
author_sort Fitzpatrick, R
collection OXFORD
description We examined whether there are advantages in terms of outcome assessment of using Rasch methods of scoring the 12-item Oxford Hip Score questionnaire over conventionally summed scores. Data were collected on patients receiving total hip replacement surgery. Three patient groups were created according to surgery type: primary, revision, and re-revision; two groups were created according to satisfaction with surgery: very satisfied and dissatisfied. Analyses were performed to test the relative precision (RP) of Rasch scoring versus conventionally summed scores in discriminating the groups experiencing different types of surgery and level of satisfaction. At the 1-year follow-up, RP ratios favored the Rasch scoring method in both tests of discrimination. Considerable gains in precision were achieved with Rasch scoring methods when groups were compared in a cross-sectional way. Alternative approaches to scoring questionnaires should be investigated to better assess comparisons over time.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T01:08:45Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:8c3ec9da-2af1-4133-8eca-f55e42d89414
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T01:08:45Z
publishDate 2003
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:8c3ec9da-2af1-4133-8eca-f55e42d894142022-03-26T22:43:27ZRasch scoring of outcomes of total hip replacement.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8c3ec9da-2af1-4133-8eca-f55e42d89414EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2003Fitzpatrick, RNorquist, JDawson, JJenkinson, CWe examined whether there are advantages in terms of outcome assessment of using Rasch methods of scoring the 12-item Oxford Hip Score questionnaire over conventionally summed scores. Data were collected on patients receiving total hip replacement surgery. Three patient groups were created according to surgery type: primary, revision, and re-revision; two groups were created according to satisfaction with surgery: very satisfied and dissatisfied. Analyses were performed to test the relative precision (RP) of Rasch scoring versus conventionally summed scores in discriminating the groups experiencing different types of surgery and level of satisfaction. At the 1-year follow-up, RP ratios favored the Rasch scoring method in both tests of discrimination. Considerable gains in precision were achieved with Rasch scoring methods when groups were compared in a cross-sectional way. Alternative approaches to scoring questionnaires should be investigated to better assess comparisons over time.
spellingShingle Fitzpatrick, R
Norquist, J
Dawson, J
Jenkinson, C
Rasch scoring of outcomes of total hip replacement.
title Rasch scoring of outcomes of total hip replacement.
title_full Rasch scoring of outcomes of total hip replacement.
title_fullStr Rasch scoring of outcomes of total hip replacement.
title_full_unstemmed Rasch scoring of outcomes of total hip replacement.
title_short Rasch scoring of outcomes of total hip replacement.
title_sort rasch scoring of outcomes of total hip replacement
work_keys_str_mv AT fitzpatrickr raschscoringofoutcomesoftotalhipreplacement
AT norquistj raschscoringofoutcomesoftotalhipreplacement
AT dawsonj raschscoringofoutcomesoftotalhipreplacement
AT jenkinsonc raschscoringofoutcomesoftotalhipreplacement