Revitalising a nineteenth century debate about life (which has been done to death): or, how to live with historiographical pluralism
This chapter shows how work in philosophy of science (PS) on pluralism and perspectivism can enhance history of science (HS). It provides a case-study from HS: a debate over the nature of life which took place at London’s Royal College of Surgeons in the early nineteenth century. According to John A...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Book section |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Routledge
2019
|
| _version_ | 1826284115348946944 |
|---|---|
| author | Aylward, A |
| author2 | Herring, E |
| author_facet | Herring, E Aylward, A |
| author_sort | Aylward, A |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | This chapter shows how work in philosophy of science (PS) on pluralism and perspectivism can enhance history of science (HS). It provides a case-study from HS: a debate over the nature of life which took place at London’s Royal College of Surgeons in the early nineteenth century. According to John Abernethy, what distinguished living from non-living matter was that, in the tradition of eighteenth-century ‘Newtonian’ ether-theories, the living was pervaded and animated by a subtle, immaterial, vital spirit. The chapter argues that a good deal of Abernethy and William Lawrence’s disagreement over the nature of life can be made sense of in terms of disparities between each man’s notions of good physiological practice. If Abernethy’s political conservatism and patriotism are wedded to his vitalism, Lawrence’s perceived radicalism and Francophilia might push too far in interpreting his doctrines as reductionist and materialist. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T01:09:01Z |
| format | Book section |
| id | oxford-uuid:8c56152b-0869-4d4e-802d-26bed51d140e |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T01:09:01Z |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | Routledge |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:8c56152b-0869-4d4e-802d-26bed51d140e2022-03-26T22:43:58ZRevitalising a nineteenth century debate about life (which has been done to death): or, how to live with historiographical pluralismBook sectionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843uuid:8c56152b-0869-4d4e-802d-26bed51d140eEnglishSymplectic ElementsRoutledge2019Aylward, AHerring, EJones, KMKiprijanov, KSSellers, LMThis chapter shows how work in philosophy of science (PS) on pluralism and perspectivism can enhance history of science (HS). It provides a case-study from HS: a debate over the nature of life which took place at London’s Royal College of Surgeons in the early nineteenth century. According to John Abernethy, what distinguished living from non-living matter was that, in the tradition of eighteenth-century ‘Newtonian’ ether-theories, the living was pervaded and animated by a subtle, immaterial, vital spirit. The chapter argues that a good deal of Abernethy and William Lawrence’s disagreement over the nature of life can be made sense of in terms of disparities between each man’s notions of good physiological practice. If Abernethy’s political conservatism and patriotism are wedded to his vitalism, Lawrence’s perceived radicalism and Francophilia might push too far in interpreting his doctrines as reductionist and materialist. |
| spellingShingle | Aylward, A Revitalising a nineteenth century debate about life (which has been done to death): or, how to live with historiographical pluralism |
| title | Revitalising a nineteenth century debate about life (which has been done to death): or, how to live with historiographical pluralism |
| title_full | Revitalising a nineteenth century debate about life (which has been done to death): or, how to live with historiographical pluralism |
| title_fullStr | Revitalising a nineteenth century debate about life (which has been done to death): or, how to live with historiographical pluralism |
| title_full_unstemmed | Revitalising a nineteenth century debate about life (which has been done to death): or, how to live with historiographical pluralism |
| title_short | Revitalising a nineteenth century debate about life (which has been done to death): or, how to live with historiographical pluralism |
| title_sort | revitalising a nineteenth century debate about life which has been done to death or how to live with historiographical pluralism |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aylwarda revitalisinganineteenthcenturydebateaboutlifewhichhasbeendonetodeathorhowtolivewithhistoriographicalpluralism |