Tactile bill-tip organs in seabirds suggest conservation of a deep avian symplesiomorphy
<jats:p>Birds’ bills are their main tactile interface with the outside world. Tactile bill-tip organs associated with specialized foraging techniques are present in several bird groups, yet remain understudied in most clades. One example is Austrodyptornithes, the major seabird clade u...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Royal Society
2024
|
| _version_ | 1811141272225710080 |
|---|---|
| author | du Toit, CJ Bond, AL Cunningham, SJ Field, DJ Portugal, SJ |
| author_facet | du Toit, CJ Bond, AL Cunningham, SJ Field, DJ Portugal, SJ |
| author_sort | du Toit, CJ |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <jats:p>Birds’ bills are their main tactile interface with the outside world. Tactile bill-tip organs associated with specialized foraging techniques are present in several bird groups, yet remain understudied in most clades. One example is Austrodyptornithes, the major seabird clade uniting Procellariiformes (albatrosses and petrels) and Sphenisciformes (penguins). Here, we describe the mechanoreceptor arrangement and neurovascular anatomy in the premaxillae of Austrodyptornithes. Using a wide phylogenetic sample of extant birds (361 species), we show that albatrosses and penguins exhibit complex tactile bill-tip anatomies, comparable to birds with known bill-tip organs, despite not being known to use tactile foraging. Petrels (Procellariidae, Hydrobatidae and Oceanitidae) lack these morphologies, indicating an evolutionary transition in bill-tip mechanosensitivity within Procellariiformes. The bill-tip organ in Austrodyptornithes may be functionally related to nocturnal foraging and prey detection under water, or courtship displays involving tactile stimulation of the bill. Alternatively, these organs may be vestigial as is likely the case in most palaeognaths (e.g. ostriches and emu). Ancestral state reconstructions fail to reject the hypothesis that the last common ancestor of Austrodyptornithes had a bill-tip organ; thus, tactile foraging may be ancestral for this major extant clade, perhaps retained from a deeper point in crown bird evolutionary history.</jats:p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:35:14Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:8dbb4625-df4a-459a-8b83-d055a5df6b70 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:35:14Z |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Royal Society |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:8dbb4625-df4a-459a-8b83-d055a5df6b702024-09-18T10:19:22ZTactile bill-tip organs in seabirds suggest conservation of a deep avian symplesiomorphyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8dbb4625-df4a-459a-8b83-d055a5df6b70EnglishSymplectic ElementsRoyal Society2024du Toit, CJBond, ALCunningham, SJField, DJPortugal, SJ<jats:p>Birds’ bills are their main tactile interface with the outside world. Tactile bill-tip organs associated with specialized foraging techniques are present in several bird groups, yet remain understudied in most clades. One example is Austrodyptornithes, the major seabird clade uniting Procellariiformes (albatrosses and petrels) and Sphenisciformes (penguins). Here, we describe the mechanoreceptor arrangement and neurovascular anatomy in the premaxillae of Austrodyptornithes. Using a wide phylogenetic sample of extant birds (361 species), we show that albatrosses and penguins exhibit complex tactile bill-tip anatomies, comparable to birds with known bill-tip organs, despite not being known to use tactile foraging. Petrels (Procellariidae, Hydrobatidae and Oceanitidae) lack these morphologies, indicating an evolutionary transition in bill-tip mechanosensitivity within Procellariiformes. The bill-tip organ in Austrodyptornithes may be functionally related to nocturnal foraging and prey detection under water, or courtship displays involving tactile stimulation of the bill. Alternatively, these organs may be vestigial as is likely the case in most palaeognaths (e.g. ostriches and emu). Ancestral state reconstructions fail to reject the hypothesis that the last common ancestor of Austrodyptornithes had a bill-tip organ; thus, tactile foraging may be ancestral for this major extant clade, perhaps retained from a deeper point in crown bird evolutionary history.</jats:p> |
| spellingShingle | du Toit, CJ Bond, AL Cunningham, SJ Field, DJ Portugal, SJ Tactile bill-tip organs in seabirds suggest conservation of a deep avian symplesiomorphy |
| title | Tactile bill-tip organs in seabirds suggest conservation of a deep avian symplesiomorphy |
| title_full | Tactile bill-tip organs in seabirds suggest conservation of a deep avian symplesiomorphy |
| title_fullStr | Tactile bill-tip organs in seabirds suggest conservation of a deep avian symplesiomorphy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Tactile bill-tip organs in seabirds suggest conservation of a deep avian symplesiomorphy |
| title_short | Tactile bill-tip organs in seabirds suggest conservation of a deep avian symplesiomorphy |
| title_sort | tactile bill tip organs in seabirds suggest conservation of a deep avian symplesiomorphy |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dutoitcj tactilebilltiporgansinseabirdssuggestconservationofadeepaviansymplesiomorphy AT bondal tactilebilltiporgansinseabirdssuggestconservationofadeepaviansymplesiomorphy AT cunninghamsj tactilebilltiporgansinseabirdssuggestconservationofadeepaviansymplesiomorphy AT fielddj tactilebilltiporgansinseabirdssuggestconservationofadeepaviansymplesiomorphy AT portugalsj tactilebilltiporgansinseabirdssuggestconservationofadeepaviansymplesiomorphy |