Social-symbolic work in the construction of social problems: constructing gender inequality in Turkish social partnerships
How social problems are constructed within social partnerships has significant effects on the management, impact, and survival of those partnerships. To explore how social problems are constructed, we adopt a social-symbolic work perspective, which highlights the variety of forms of work involved in...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer
2023
|
| _version_ | 1811139835339997184 |
|---|---|
| author | Karakulak, O Lawrence, TB |
| author_facet | Karakulak, O Lawrence, TB |
| author_sort | Karakulak, O |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | How social problems are constructed within social partnerships has significant effects on the management, impact, and survival of those partnerships. To explore how social problems are constructed, we adopt a social-symbolic work perspective, which highlights the variety of forms of work involved in this process, how they interact, and the impact of context on that process. Empirically, we focus on two social partnerships in Turkey that both addressed gender inequality but constructed that problem in very different terms. Our study suggests that the differences in how they came to construct the problem of gender inequality in Turkey was tied to the qualities of two forms of social-symbolic work—relational work and practice work—in which they engaged: the partnership that constructed gender inequality as an embedded problem engaged in extensive relational work and deep practice work; in contrast, the partnership that constructed the problem as disembedded engaged in efficient relational work and shallow practice work. Further, we observed that the construction of the problem of gender inequality was tied to different outcomes: an embedded social construction of the problem was associated with holistic outcomes on a more limited scale; a disembedded construction of the problem was associated with simpler outcomes on a greater scale. The paper contributes to the literature on social partnerships by showing how social problems are constructed through partners' work and how this affects their impact and sustainability. It also extends the literature on social-symbolic work by highlighting the interplay of different forms of work in constructing social problems. Finally, it contributes to research on gender inequality and organizations by showing how the work of social partnerships can shape conceptions of gender inequality at the meso level. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T08:15:50Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:8e81ba6f-7a51-4d85-a63b-cc587fea5f12 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:12:24Z |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publisher | Springer |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:8e81ba6f-7a51-4d85-a63b-cc587fea5f122024-07-03T09:36:50ZSocial-symbolic work in the construction of social problems: constructing gender inequality in Turkish social partnershipsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8e81ba6f-7a51-4d85-a63b-cc587fea5f12EnglishSymplectic ElementsSpringer2023Karakulak, OLawrence, TBHow social problems are constructed within social partnerships has significant effects on the management, impact, and survival of those partnerships. To explore how social problems are constructed, we adopt a social-symbolic work perspective, which highlights the variety of forms of work involved in this process, how they interact, and the impact of context on that process. Empirically, we focus on two social partnerships in Turkey that both addressed gender inequality but constructed that problem in very different terms. Our study suggests that the differences in how they came to construct the problem of gender inequality in Turkey was tied to the qualities of two forms of social-symbolic work—relational work and practice work—in which they engaged: the partnership that constructed gender inequality as an embedded problem engaged in extensive relational work and deep practice work; in contrast, the partnership that constructed the problem as disembedded engaged in efficient relational work and shallow practice work. Further, we observed that the construction of the problem of gender inequality was tied to different outcomes: an embedded social construction of the problem was associated with holistic outcomes on a more limited scale; a disembedded construction of the problem was associated with simpler outcomes on a greater scale. The paper contributes to the literature on social partnerships by showing how social problems are constructed through partners' work and how this affects their impact and sustainability. It also extends the literature on social-symbolic work by highlighting the interplay of different forms of work in constructing social problems. Finally, it contributes to research on gender inequality and organizations by showing how the work of social partnerships can shape conceptions of gender inequality at the meso level. |
| spellingShingle | Karakulak, O Lawrence, TB Social-symbolic work in the construction of social problems: constructing gender inequality in Turkish social partnerships |
| title | Social-symbolic work in the construction of social problems: constructing gender inequality in Turkish social partnerships |
| title_full | Social-symbolic work in the construction of social problems: constructing gender inequality in Turkish social partnerships |
| title_fullStr | Social-symbolic work in the construction of social problems: constructing gender inequality in Turkish social partnerships |
| title_full_unstemmed | Social-symbolic work in the construction of social problems: constructing gender inequality in Turkish social partnerships |
| title_short | Social-symbolic work in the construction of social problems: constructing gender inequality in Turkish social partnerships |
| title_sort | social symbolic work in the construction of social problems constructing gender inequality in turkish social partnerships |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT karakulako socialsymbolicworkintheconstructionofsocialproblemsconstructinggenderinequalityinturkishsocialpartnerships AT lawrencetb socialsymbolicworkintheconstructionofsocialproblemsconstructinggenderinequalityinturkishsocialpartnerships |