Detection of extracolonic pathologic findings with CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment of perceived benefits versus harms.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum rate of false-positive diagnoses that patients and health care professionals were willing to accept in exchange for detection of extracolonic malignancy by using computed tomographic (CT) colonography for colorectal cancer screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After obt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Plumb, A, Boone, D, Fitzke, H, Helbren, E, Mallett, S, Zhu, S, Yao, G, Bell, N, Ghanouni, A, von Wagner, C, Taylor, SA, Altman, D, Lilford, R, Halligan, S
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2014
_version_ 1797081583769878528
author Plumb, A
Boone, D
Fitzke, H
Helbren, E
Mallett, S
Zhu, S
Yao, G
Bell, N
Ghanouni, A
von Wagner, C
Taylor, SA
Altman, D
Lilford, R
Halligan, S
author_facet Plumb, A
Boone, D
Fitzke, H
Helbren, E
Mallett, S
Zhu, S
Yao, G
Bell, N
Ghanouni, A
von Wagner, C
Taylor, SA
Altman, D
Lilford, R
Halligan, S
author_sort Plumb, A
collection OXFORD
description PURPOSE: To determine the maximum rate of false-positive diagnoses that patients and health care professionals were willing to accept in exchange for detection of extracolonic malignancy by using computed tomographic (CT) colonography for colorectal cancer screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After obtaining ethical approval and informed consent, 52 patients and 50 health care professionals undertook two discrete choice experiments where they chose between unrestricted CT colonography that examined intra- and extracolonic organs or CT colonography restricted to the colon, across different scenarios. The first experiment detected one extracolonic malignancy per 600 cases with a false-positive rate varying across scenarios from 0% to 99.8%. One experiment examined radiologic follow-up generated by false-positive diagnoses while the other examined invasive follow-up. Intracolonic performance was identical for both tests. The median tipping point (maximum acceptable false-positive rate for extracolonic findings) was calculated overall and for both groups by bootstrap analysis. RESULTS: The median tipping point for radiologic follow-up occurred at a false-positive rate greater than 99.8% (interquartile ratio [IQR], 10 to >99.8%). Participants would tolerate at least a 99.8% rate of unnecessary radiologic tests to detect an additional extracolonic malignancy. The median tipping-point for invasive follow-up occurred at a false-positive rate of 10% (IQR, 2 to >99.8%). Tipping points were significantly higher for patients than for health care professionals for both experiments (>99.8 vs 40% for radiologic follow-up and >99.8 vs 5% for invasive follow-up, both P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients and health care professionals are willing to tolerate high rates of false-positive diagnoses with CT colonography in exchange for diagnosis of extracolonic malignancy. The actual specificity of screening CT colonography for extracolonic findings in clinical practice is likely to be highly acceptable to both patients and health care professionals. Online supplemental material is available for this article.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T01:16:15Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:8ecd0ba6-87c7-4cfd-a259-aedb2ba88eff
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T01:16:15Z
publishDate 2014
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:8ecd0ba6-87c7-4cfd-a259-aedb2ba88eff2022-03-26T22:59:59ZDetection of extracolonic pathologic findings with CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment of perceived benefits versus harms.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8ecd0ba6-87c7-4cfd-a259-aedb2ba88effEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2014Plumb, ABoone, DFitzke, HHelbren, EMallett, SZhu, SYao, GBell, NGhanouni, Avon Wagner, CTaylor, SAAltman, DLilford, RHalligan, SPURPOSE: To determine the maximum rate of false-positive diagnoses that patients and health care professionals were willing to accept in exchange for detection of extracolonic malignancy by using computed tomographic (CT) colonography for colorectal cancer screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After obtaining ethical approval and informed consent, 52 patients and 50 health care professionals undertook two discrete choice experiments where they chose between unrestricted CT colonography that examined intra- and extracolonic organs or CT colonography restricted to the colon, across different scenarios. The first experiment detected one extracolonic malignancy per 600 cases with a false-positive rate varying across scenarios from 0% to 99.8%. One experiment examined radiologic follow-up generated by false-positive diagnoses while the other examined invasive follow-up. Intracolonic performance was identical for both tests. The median tipping point (maximum acceptable false-positive rate for extracolonic findings) was calculated overall and for both groups by bootstrap analysis. RESULTS: The median tipping point for radiologic follow-up occurred at a false-positive rate greater than 99.8% (interquartile ratio [IQR], 10 to >99.8%). Participants would tolerate at least a 99.8% rate of unnecessary radiologic tests to detect an additional extracolonic malignancy. The median tipping-point for invasive follow-up occurred at a false-positive rate of 10% (IQR, 2 to >99.8%). Tipping points were significantly higher for patients than for health care professionals for both experiments (>99.8 vs 40% for radiologic follow-up and >99.8 vs 5% for invasive follow-up, both P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients and health care professionals are willing to tolerate high rates of false-positive diagnoses with CT colonography in exchange for diagnosis of extracolonic malignancy. The actual specificity of screening CT colonography for extracolonic findings in clinical practice is likely to be highly acceptable to both patients and health care professionals. Online supplemental material is available for this article.
spellingShingle Plumb, A
Boone, D
Fitzke, H
Helbren, E
Mallett, S
Zhu, S
Yao, G
Bell, N
Ghanouni, A
von Wagner, C
Taylor, SA
Altman, D
Lilford, R
Halligan, S
Detection of extracolonic pathologic findings with CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment of perceived benefits versus harms.
title Detection of extracolonic pathologic findings with CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment of perceived benefits versus harms.
title_full Detection of extracolonic pathologic findings with CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment of perceived benefits versus harms.
title_fullStr Detection of extracolonic pathologic findings with CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment of perceived benefits versus harms.
title_full_unstemmed Detection of extracolonic pathologic findings with CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment of perceived benefits versus harms.
title_short Detection of extracolonic pathologic findings with CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment of perceived benefits versus harms.
title_sort detection of extracolonic pathologic findings with ct colonography a discrete choice experiment of perceived benefits versus harms
work_keys_str_mv AT plumba detectionofextracolonicpathologicfindingswithctcolonographyadiscretechoiceexperimentofperceivedbenefitsversusharms
AT booned detectionofextracolonicpathologicfindingswithctcolonographyadiscretechoiceexperimentofperceivedbenefitsversusharms
AT fitzkeh detectionofextracolonicpathologicfindingswithctcolonographyadiscretechoiceexperimentofperceivedbenefitsversusharms
AT helbrene detectionofextracolonicpathologicfindingswithctcolonographyadiscretechoiceexperimentofperceivedbenefitsversusharms
AT malletts detectionofextracolonicpathologicfindingswithctcolonographyadiscretechoiceexperimentofperceivedbenefitsversusharms
AT zhus detectionofextracolonicpathologicfindingswithctcolonographyadiscretechoiceexperimentofperceivedbenefitsversusharms
AT yaog detectionofextracolonicpathologicfindingswithctcolonographyadiscretechoiceexperimentofperceivedbenefitsversusharms
AT belln detectionofextracolonicpathologicfindingswithctcolonographyadiscretechoiceexperimentofperceivedbenefitsversusharms
AT ghanounia detectionofextracolonicpathologicfindingswithctcolonographyadiscretechoiceexperimentofperceivedbenefitsversusharms
AT vonwagnerc detectionofextracolonicpathologicfindingswithctcolonographyadiscretechoiceexperimentofperceivedbenefitsversusharms
AT taylorsa detectionofextracolonicpathologicfindingswithctcolonographyadiscretechoiceexperimentofperceivedbenefitsversusharms
AT altmand detectionofextracolonicpathologicfindingswithctcolonographyadiscretechoiceexperimentofperceivedbenefitsversusharms
AT lilfordr detectionofextracolonicpathologicfindingswithctcolonographyadiscretechoiceexperimentofperceivedbenefitsversusharms
AT halligans detectionofextracolonicpathologicfindingswithctcolonographyadiscretechoiceexperimentofperceivedbenefitsversusharms