Terms of debate: consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction
<p>Hypothesis-driven research rests on clearly articulated scientific theories. The building blocks for communicating these theories are scientific terms. Obviously, communication – and thus, scientific progress – is hampered if the meaning of these terms varies idiosyncrat...
Main Authors: | Liesefeld, HR, Lamy, D, Gaspelin, N, Geng, JJ, Kerzel, D, Schall, JD, Allen, HA, Anderson, BA, Boettcher, S, Busch, NA, Carlisle, NB, Colonius, H, Draschkow, D, Egeth, H, Leber, AB, Müller, HJ, Röer, JP, Schubö, A, Slagter, HA, Theeuwes, J, Wolfe, J |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer
2024
|
Similar Items
-
A Critique of the Attentional Window Account of Capture Failures
by: Nicholas Gaspelin, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01) -
Multifaceted consequences of visual distraction during natural behaviour
by: Kumle, L, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Metacognition in Auditory Distraction: How Expectations about Distractibility Influence the Irrelevant Sound Effect
by: Jan Philipp Röer, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01) -
Neural mechanisms underlying expectation-dependent inhibition of distracting information
by: Dirk van Moorselaar, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Minimizing Duration of Headframe Wear for Le Fort I Maxillary Advancement with Distraction Osteogenesis Using Rigid External Distraction Devices
by: Erin Wolfe, BS, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)