Crustal structure of the Kermadec arc from MANGO seismic refraction profiles

Three active-source seismic refraction profiles are integrated with morphological and potential field data to place the first regional constraints on the structure of the Kermadec subduction zone. These observations are used to test contrasting tectonic models for an along-strike transition in margi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bassett, D, Kopp, H, Sutherland, R, Henrys, S, Watts, A, Timm, C, Scherwath, M, Grevemeyer, I, de Ronde, C
Format: Journal article
Published: Wiley 2016
_version_ 1797081618140102656
author Bassett, D
Kopp, H
Sutherland, R
Henrys, S
Watts, A
Timm, C
Scherwath, M
Grevemeyer, I
de Ronde, C
author_facet Bassett, D
Kopp, H
Sutherland, R
Henrys, S
Watts, A
Timm, C
Scherwath, M
Grevemeyer, I
de Ronde, C
author_sort Bassett, D
collection OXFORD
description Three active-source seismic refraction profiles are integrated with morphological and potential field data to place the first regional constraints on the structure of the Kermadec subduction zone. These observations are used to test contrasting tectonic models for an along-strike transition in margin structure previously known as the 32°S boundary. We use residual bathymetry to constrain the geometry of this boundary and propose the name Central Kermadec Discontinuity (CKD). North of the CKD, the buried Tonga Ridge occupies the fore-arc with VP 6.5–7.3 km s^-1 and residual free-air gravity anomalies constrain its latitudinal extent (north of 30.5°S), width (110 ± 20 km), and strike (~005° south of 25°S). South of the CKD the fore-arc is structurally homogeneous downdip with VP 5.7–7.3 km s^-1. In the Havre Trough back-arc, crustal thickness south of the CKD is 8–9 km, which is up to 4 km thinner than the northern Havre Trough and at least 1 km thinner than the southern Havre Trough. We suggest that the Eocene arc did not extend along the current length of the Tonga-Kermadec trench. The Eocene arc was originally connected to the Three Kings Ridge, and the CKD was likely formed during separation and easterly translation of an Eocene arc substrate during the early Oligocene. We suggest that the first-order crustal thickness variations along the Kermadec arc were inherited from before the Neogene and reflect Mesozoic crustal structure, the Cenozoic evolution of the Tonga-Kermadec-Hikurangi margin and along-strike variations in the duration of arc volcanism.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T01:16:45Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:8ef268a1-02bd-406f-812a-50029bf80558
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T01:16:45Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:8ef268a1-02bd-406f-812a-50029bf805582022-03-26T23:01:05ZCrustal structure of the Kermadec arc from MANGO seismic refraction profilesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8ef268a1-02bd-406f-812a-50029bf80558Symplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2016Bassett, DKopp, HSutherland, RHenrys, SWatts, ATimm, CScherwath, MGrevemeyer, Ide Ronde, CThree active-source seismic refraction profiles are integrated with morphological and potential field data to place the first regional constraints on the structure of the Kermadec subduction zone. These observations are used to test contrasting tectonic models for an along-strike transition in margin structure previously known as the 32°S boundary. We use residual bathymetry to constrain the geometry of this boundary and propose the name Central Kermadec Discontinuity (CKD). North of the CKD, the buried Tonga Ridge occupies the fore-arc with VP 6.5–7.3 km s^-1 and residual free-air gravity anomalies constrain its latitudinal extent (north of 30.5°S), width (110 ± 20 km), and strike (~005° south of 25°S). South of the CKD the fore-arc is structurally homogeneous downdip with VP 5.7–7.3 km s^-1. In the Havre Trough back-arc, crustal thickness south of the CKD is 8–9 km, which is up to 4 km thinner than the northern Havre Trough and at least 1 km thinner than the southern Havre Trough. We suggest that the Eocene arc did not extend along the current length of the Tonga-Kermadec trench. The Eocene arc was originally connected to the Three Kings Ridge, and the CKD was likely formed during separation and easterly translation of an Eocene arc substrate during the early Oligocene. We suggest that the first-order crustal thickness variations along the Kermadec arc were inherited from before the Neogene and reflect Mesozoic crustal structure, the Cenozoic evolution of the Tonga-Kermadec-Hikurangi margin and along-strike variations in the duration of arc volcanism.
spellingShingle Bassett, D
Kopp, H
Sutherland, R
Henrys, S
Watts, A
Timm, C
Scherwath, M
Grevemeyer, I
de Ronde, C
Crustal structure of the Kermadec arc from MANGO seismic refraction profiles
title Crustal structure of the Kermadec arc from MANGO seismic refraction profiles
title_full Crustal structure of the Kermadec arc from MANGO seismic refraction profiles
title_fullStr Crustal structure of the Kermadec arc from MANGO seismic refraction profiles
title_full_unstemmed Crustal structure of the Kermadec arc from MANGO seismic refraction profiles
title_short Crustal structure of the Kermadec arc from MANGO seismic refraction profiles
title_sort crustal structure of the kermadec arc from mango seismic refraction profiles
work_keys_str_mv AT bassettd crustalstructureofthekermadecarcfrommangoseismicrefractionprofiles
AT kopph crustalstructureofthekermadecarcfrommangoseismicrefractionprofiles
AT sutherlandr crustalstructureofthekermadecarcfrommangoseismicrefractionprofiles
AT henryss crustalstructureofthekermadecarcfrommangoseismicrefractionprofiles
AT wattsa crustalstructureofthekermadecarcfrommangoseismicrefractionprofiles
AT timmc crustalstructureofthekermadecarcfrommangoseismicrefractionprofiles
AT scherwathm crustalstructureofthekermadecarcfrommangoseismicrefractionprofiles
AT grevemeyeri crustalstructureofthekermadecarcfrommangoseismicrefractionprofiles
AT derondec crustalstructureofthekermadecarcfrommangoseismicrefractionprofiles