International R&D; Rivalry and Industrial Strategy without Government Commitment.
We examine optimal industrial and trade policies in a series of dynamic oligopoly games in which a home and a foreign firm compete in R&D; and output. Alternative assumptions about the timing of moves and the ability of agents to commit intertemporally are considered. We show that the home e...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Working paper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
CEPR
1995
|
| _version_ | 1826284633825738752 |
|---|---|
| author | Leahy, D Neary, J |
| author_facet | Leahy, D Neary, J |
| author_sort | Leahy, D |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | We examine optimal industrial and trade policies in a series of dynamic oligopoly games in which a home and a foreign firm compete in R&D; and output. Alternative assumptions about the timing of moves and the ability of agents to commit intertemporally are considered. We show that the home export subsidy, R&D; subsidy and welfare are higher in an equilibrium in which government commitment is credible than in the dynamically consistent equilibrium without commitment. Commitment yields gains but so does unanticipated reneging, whereas reneging which is anticipated by firms yields the lowest welfare of all. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T01:16:46Z |
| format | Working paper |
| id | oxford-uuid:8ef40c20-777d-450f-8e36-df045cf5f52f |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T01:16:46Z |
| publishDate | 1995 |
| publisher | CEPR |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:8ef40c20-777d-450f-8e36-df045cf5f52f2022-03-26T23:01:11ZInternational R&D; Rivalry and Industrial Strategy without Government Commitment.Working paperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042uuid:8ef40c20-777d-450f-8e36-df045cf5f52fEnglishDepartment of Economics - ePrintsCEPR1995Leahy, DNeary, JWe examine optimal industrial and trade policies in a series of dynamic oligopoly games in which a home and a foreign firm compete in R&D; and output. Alternative assumptions about the timing of moves and the ability of agents to commit intertemporally are considered. We show that the home export subsidy, R&D; subsidy and welfare are higher in an equilibrium in which government commitment is credible than in the dynamically consistent equilibrium without commitment. Commitment yields gains but so does unanticipated reneging, whereas reneging which is anticipated by firms yields the lowest welfare of all. |
| spellingShingle | Leahy, D Neary, J International R&D; Rivalry and Industrial Strategy without Government Commitment. |
| title | International R&D; Rivalry and Industrial Strategy without Government Commitment. |
| title_full | International R&D; Rivalry and Industrial Strategy without Government Commitment. |
| title_fullStr | International R&D; Rivalry and Industrial Strategy without Government Commitment. |
| title_full_unstemmed | International R&D; Rivalry and Industrial Strategy without Government Commitment. |
| title_short | International R&D; Rivalry and Industrial Strategy without Government Commitment. |
| title_sort | international r amp d rivalry and industrial strategy without government commitment |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT leahyd internationalrampdrivalryandindustrialstrategywithoutgovernmentcommitment AT nearyj internationalrampdrivalryandindustrialstrategywithoutgovernmentcommitment |