On the impact of gaps on trend detection in extreme streamflow time series

Streamflow time series often contain gaps of varying length and location. However, the influence of these gaps on trend detection is poorly understood and cannot be estimated a priori in trend detection studies. We simulated the effects of varying gap size (1, 2, 5, and 10 years) and location (one q...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Slater, L, Villarini, G
Format: Journal article
Published: Wiley 2016
_version_ 1826284823442882560
author Slater, L
Villarini, G
author_facet Slater, L
Villarini, G
author_sort Slater, L
collection OXFORD
description Streamflow time series often contain gaps of varying length and location. However, the influence of these gaps on trend detection is poorly understood and cannot be estimated a priori in trend detection studies. We simulated the effects of varying gap size (1, 2, 5, and 10 years) and location (one quarter, one third, and half of the way) on the detection rate of significant monotonic trends in annual maxima and peaks‐over‐threshold, based on the most commonly‐used trend tests in time series of varying length (from 15 to 150 years) and trend magnitude (β1). Results show that, in comparison with the complete time series, the loss in trend detection rate tends to grow with (1) increasing gap size, (2) increasing gap distance from the middle of the time series, (3) decreasing β1 slope, and (4) decreasing time series length. Based on these findings, we provide objective recommendations and cautionary remarks for maximal gap allowance in trend detection in extreme streamflow time series.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T01:19:38Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:8fe3ae96-82a7-416d-820a-82cb7ff90d85
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T01:19:38Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:8fe3ae96-82a7-416d-820a-82cb7ff90d852022-03-26T23:07:36ZOn the impact of gaps on trend detection in extreme streamflow time seriesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8fe3ae96-82a7-416d-820a-82cb7ff90d85Symplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2016Slater, LVillarini, GStreamflow time series often contain gaps of varying length and location. However, the influence of these gaps on trend detection is poorly understood and cannot be estimated a priori in trend detection studies. We simulated the effects of varying gap size (1, 2, 5, and 10 years) and location (one quarter, one third, and half of the way) on the detection rate of significant monotonic trends in annual maxima and peaks‐over‐threshold, based on the most commonly‐used trend tests in time series of varying length (from 15 to 150 years) and trend magnitude (β1). Results show that, in comparison with the complete time series, the loss in trend detection rate tends to grow with (1) increasing gap size, (2) increasing gap distance from the middle of the time series, (3) decreasing β1 slope, and (4) decreasing time series length. Based on these findings, we provide objective recommendations and cautionary remarks for maximal gap allowance in trend detection in extreme streamflow time series.
spellingShingle Slater, L
Villarini, G
On the impact of gaps on trend detection in extreme streamflow time series
title On the impact of gaps on trend detection in extreme streamflow time series
title_full On the impact of gaps on trend detection in extreme streamflow time series
title_fullStr On the impact of gaps on trend detection in extreme streamflow time series
title_full_unstemmed On the impact of gaps on trend detection in extreme streamflow time series
title_short On the impact of gaps on trend detection in extreme streamflow time series
title_sort on the impact of gaps on trend detection in extreme streamflow time series
work_keys_str_mv AT slaterl ontheimpactofgapsontrenddetectioninextremestreamflowtimeseries
AT villarinig ontheimpactofgapsontrenddetectioninextremestreamflowtimeseries