Testing the motivational strength of positive and negative duty arguments regarding global poverty
Two main types of philosophical arguments have been given in support of the claim that the citizens of affluent societies have stringent moral duties to aid the global poor: “positive duty” arguments based on the notion of beneficence and “negative duty” arguments based on noninterference. Peter Sin...
Main Authors: | Buckland, L, Lindauer, M, Rodríguez-Arias, D, Véliz, C |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer
2021
|
Similar Items
-
Regarding negative interrogatives in American English as argumentative structures
by: Pauline Levillain
Published: (2015-02-01) -
The Poverty of the Stimulus Argument Once Again
by: Liza Skidelsky
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Motives to assist and reasons to assist : the case of global poverty
by: Keller, S
Published: (2015) -
On affluence and poverty: morality, motivation and practice in a global age
by: Gabriel, I
Published: (2013) -
Policy Silences and Poverty in Ireland: An Argument for Inclusive Approaches
by: Joe Whelan
Published: (2024-02-01)