Response to 'position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle therapy'
In August 2011, a group of medical doctors, ethicists, academic and medical physicists were asked to debate and reach consensus on the potential need for randomised control trials to test charged particle radiation therapy (CPRT) for treating tumours. The outcome of the meeting was a paper recently...
Main Authors: | Jones, B, Howick, J, Hopewell, J, Liew, S |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Similar Items
-
Response to 'Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle therapy'.
by: Jones, B, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle radiation therapy
by: Sheehan, M, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle radiation therapy.
by: Sheehan, M, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Research ethics in 'Closing the Gap': equipoise in randomised controlled trials in education
by: Fancourt, NPM
Published: (2017) -
What do we talk about when we talk about “equipoise”? Stakeholder interviews assessing the use of equipoise in clinical research ethics
by: Brian Dewar, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)