Cost-effectiveness of aspirin adjuvant therapy in early stage colorectal cancer in older patients

BACKGROUND and AIMS: Recent observational studies showed that post-operative aspirin use reduces cancer relapse and death in the earliest stages of colorectal cancer. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of aspirin as an adjuvant therapy in Stage I and II colorectal cancer patients aged 65 y...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soon, S, Chia, W, Chan, M, Ho, G, Jian, X, Deng, Y, Tan, C, Sharma, A, Segelov, E, Mehta, S, Ali, R, Toh, H, Wee, H
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2014
_version_ 1826285382211207168
author Soon, S
Chia, W
Chan, M
Ho, G
Jian, X
Deng, Y
Tan, C
Sharma, A
Segelov, E
Mehta, S
Ali, R
Toh, H
Wee, H
author_facet Soon, S
Chia, W
Chan, M
Ho, G
Jian, X
Deng, Y
Tan, C
Sharma, A
Segelov, E
Mehta, S
Ali, R
Toh, H
Wee, H
author_sort Soon, S
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND and AIMS: Recent observational studies showed that post-operative aspirin use reduces cancer relapse and death in the earliest stages of colorectal cancer. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of aspirin as an adjuvant therapy in Stage I and II colorectal cancer patients aged 65 years and older. METHODS: Two five-state Markov models were constructed separately for Stage I and II colorectal cancer using TreeAge Pro 2014. Two hypothetical cohorts of 10,000 individuals at a starting age of 65 years and with colorectal cancer in remission were put through the models separately. Cost-effectiveness of aspirin was evaluated against no treatment (Stage I and II) and capecitabine (Stage II) over a 20-year period from the United States societal perspective. Extensive one-way sensitivity analyses and multivariable Probabilistic Sensitivity Analyses (PSA) were performed. RESULTS: In the base case analyses, aspirin was cheaper and more effective compared to other comparators in both stages. Sensitivity analyses showed that no treatment and capecitabine (Stage II only) can be cost-effective alternatives if the utility of taking aspirin is below 0.909, aspirin's annual fatal adverse event probability exceeds 0.57%, aspirin's relative risk of disease progression is 0.997 or more, or when capecitabine's relative risk of disease progression is less than 0.228. Probabilistic Sensitivity Analyses (PSA) further showed that aspirin could be cost-effective 50% to 80% of the time when the willingness-to-pay threshold was varied from USD 20,000 to USD 100,000. CONCLUSION: Even with a modest treatment benefit, aspirin is likely to be cost-effective in Stage I and II colorectal cancer, thus suggesting a potential unique role in secondary prevention in this group of patients.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T01:27:58Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:929cf00c-02fe-454c-a412-2a5777529098
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T01:27:58Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:929cf00c-02fe-454c-a412-2a57775290982022-03-26T23:26:47ZCost-effectiveness of aspirin adjuvant therapy in early stage colorectal cancer in older patientsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:929cf00c-02fe-454c-a412-2a5777529098EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordPublic Library of Science2014Soon, SChia, WChan, MHo, GJian, XDeng, YTan, CSharma, ASegelov, EMehta, SAli, RToh, HWee, HBACKGROUND and AIMS: Recent observational studies showed that post-operative aspirin use reduces cancer relapse and death in the earliest stages of colorectal cancer. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of aspirin as an adjuvant therapy in Stage I and II colorectal cancer patients aged 65 years and older. METHODS: Two five-state Markov models were constructed separately for Stage I and II colorectal cancer using TreeAge Pro 2014. Two hypothetical cohorts of 10,000 individuals at a starting age of 65 years and with colorectal cancer in remission were put through the models separately. Cost-effectiveness of aspirin was evaluated against no treatment (Stage I and II) and capecitabine (Stage II) over a 20-year period from the United States societal perspective. Extensive one-way sensitivity analyses and multivariable Probabilistic Sensitivity Analyses (PSA) were performed. RESULTS: In the base case analyses, aspirin was cheaper and more effective compared to other comparators in both stages. Sensitivity analyses showed that no treatment and capecitabine (Stage II only) can be cost-effective alternatives if the utility of taking aspirin is below 0.909, aspirin's annual fatal adverse event probability exceeds 0.57%, aspirin's relative risk of disease progression is 0.997 or more, or when capecitabine's relative risk of disease progression is less than 0.228. Probabilistic Sensitivity Analyses (PSA) further showed that aspirin could be cost-effective 50% to 80% of the time when the willingness-to-pay threshold was varied from USD 20,000 to USD 100,000. CONCLUSION: Even with a modest treatment benefit, aspirin is likely to be cost-effective in Stage I and II colorectal cancer, thus suggesting a potential unique role in secondary prevention in this group of patients.
spellingShingle Soon, S
Chia, W
Chan, M
Ho, G
Jian, X
Deng, Y
Tan, C
Sharma, A
Segelov, E
Mehta, S
Ali, R
Toh, H
Wee, H
Cost-effectiveness of aspirin adjuvant therapy in early stage colorectal cancer in older patients
title Cost-effectiveness of aspirin adjuvant therapy in early stage colorectal cancer in older patients
title_full Cost-effectiveness of aspirin adjuvant therapy in early stage colorectal cancer in older patients
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of aspirin adjuvant therapy in early stage colorectal cancer in older patients
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of aspirin adjuvant therapy in early stage colorectal cancer in older patients
title_short Cost-effectiveness of aspirin adjuvant therapy in early stage colorectal cancer in older patients
title_sort cost effectiveness of aspirin adjuvant therapy in early stage colorectal cancer in older patients
work_keys_str_mv AT soons costeffectivenessofaspirinadjuvanttherapyinearlystagecolorectalcancerinolderpatients
AT chiaw costeffectivenessofaspirinadjuvanttherapyinearlystagecolorectalcancerinolderpatients
AT chanm costeffectivenessofaspirinadjuvanttherapyinearlystagecolorectalcancerinolderpatients
AT hog costeffectivenessofaspirinadjuvanttherapyinearlystagecolorectalcancerinolderpatients
AT jianx costeffectivenessofaspirinadjuvanttherapyinearlystagecolorectalcancerinolderpatients
AT dengy costeffectivenessofaspirinadjuvanttherapyinearlystagecolorectalcancerinolderpatients
AT tanc costeffectivenessofaspirinadjuvanttherapyinearlystagecolorectalcancerinolderpatients
AT sharmaa costeffectivenessofaspirinadjuvanttherapyinearlystagecolorectalcancerinolderpatients
AT segelove costeffectivenessofaspirinadjuvanttherapyinearlystagecolorectalcancerinolderpatients
AT mehtas costeffectivenessofaspirinadjuvanttherapyinearlystagecolorectalcancerinolderpatients
AT alir costeffectivenessofaspirinadjuvanttherapyinearlystagecolorectalcancerinolderpatients
AT tohh costeffectivenessofaspirinadjuvanttherapyinearlystagecolorectalcancerinolderpatients
AT weeh costeffectivenessofaspirinadjuvanttherapyinearlystagecolorectalcancerinolderpatients