In defence of logical nominalism: reply to Leftow
<p style="text-align:justify;"> This paper defends (especially in response to Brian Leftow's recent attack) logical nominalism, the thesis that logically necessary truth belongs primarily to sentences and depends solely on the conventions of human language. A sentence is logica...
Autor principal: | Swinburne, R |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2010
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Timelessness à la Leftow
por: Ben Page
Publicado: (2024-03-01) -
On Emily Paul on Brian Leftow
por: Matthew James Collier
Publicado: (2019-09-01) -
Science without numbers : a defence of nominalism/
por: 366719 Field, Hartry H.
Publicado: (1980) -
Nominalism, Trivialism, Logicism
por: Rayo, Agustin
Publicado: (2015) -
Reply to blackburn
por: Swinburne, R
Publicado: (2009)