In defence of logical nominalism: reply to Leftow
<p style="text-align:justify;"> This paper defends (especially in response to Brian Leftow's recent attack) logical nominalism, the thesis that logically necessary truth belongs primarily to sentences and depends solely on the conventions of human language. A sentence is logica...
Váldodahkki: | Swinburne, R |
---|---|
Materiálatiipa: | Journal article |
Giella: | English |
Almmustuhtton: |
Cambridge University Press
2010
|
Geahča maid
-
Timelessness à la Leftow
Dahkki: Ben Page
Almmustuhtton: (2024-03-01) -
On Emily Paul on Brian Leftow
Dahkki: Matthew James Collier
Almmustuhtton: (2019-09-01) -
Science without numbers : a defence of nominalism/
Dahkki: 366719 Field, Hartry H.
Almmustuhtton: (1980) -
Nominalism, Trivialism, Logicism
Dahkki: Rayo, Agustin
Almmustuhtton: (2015) -
Reply to blackburn
Dahkki: Swinburne, R
Almmustuhtton: (2009)