In defence of logical nominalism: reply to Leftow
<p style="text-align:justify;"> This paper defends (especially in response to Brian Leftow's recent attack) logical nominalism, the thesis that logically necessary truth belongs primarily to sentences and depends solely on the conventions of human language. A sentence is logica...
Main Author: | Swinburne, R |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2010
|
Similar Items
-
Timelessness à la Leftow
by: Ben Page
Published: (2024-03-01) -
On Emily Paul on Brian Leftow
by: Matthew James Collier
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Science without numbers : a defence of nominalism/
by: 366719 Field, Hartry H.
Published: (1980) -
Nominalism, Trivialism, Logicism
by: Rayo, Agustin
Published: (2015) -
Reply to blackburn
by: Swinburne, R
Published: (2009)