In defence of logical nominalism: reply to Leftow
<p style="text-align:justify;"> This paper defends (especially in response to Brian Leftow's recent attack) logical nominalism, the thesis that logically necessary truth belongs primarily to sentences and depends solely on the conventions of human language. A sentence is logica...
Autore principale: | Swinburne, R |
---|---|
Natura: | Journal article |
Lingua: | English |
Pubblicazione: |
Cambridge University Press
2010
|
Documenti analoghi
-
Timelessness à la Leftow
di: Ben Page
Pubblicazione: (2024-03-01) -
On Emily Paul on Brian Leftow
di: Matthew James Collier
Pubblicazione: (2019-09-01) -
Science without numbers : a defence of nominalism/
di: 366719 Field, Hartry H.
Pubblicazione: (1980) -
Nominalism, Trivialism, Logicism
di: Rayo, Agustin
Pubblicazione: (2015) -
Reply to blackburn
di: Swinburne, R
Pubblicazione: (2009)