In defence of logical nominalism: reply to Leftow
<p style="text-align:justify;"> This paper defends (especially in response to Brian Leftow's recent attack) logical nominalism, the thesis that logically necessary truth belongs primarily to sentences and depends solely on the conventions of human language. A sentence is logica...
主要作者: | Swinburne, R |
---|---|
格式: | Journal article |
語言: | English |
出版: |
Cambridge University Press
2010
|
相似書籍
-
Timelessness à la Leftow
由: Ben Page
出版: (2024-03-01) -
On Emily Paul on Brian Leftow
由: Matthew James Collier
出版: (2019-09-01) -
Science without numbers : a defence of nominalism/
由: 366719 Field, Hartry H.
出版: (1980) -
Nominalism, Trivialism, Logicism
由: Rayo, Agustin
出版: (2015) -
Reply to blackburn
由: Swinburne, R
出版: (2009)