A COMPARISON OF THE NON-BOLOMETRIC MICROWAVE RESPONSE WITH THE BOLOMETRIC OPTICAL-RESPONSE OF TL-OXIDE AND BI-OXIDE SUPERCONDUCTORS

The distinction between the bolometric and non-bolometric responses of high Tc Ti- and Bi- oxide superconducting thin films is presented by comparison of the characteristics of the responses at different temperatures and chopping frequencies. The bolometric optical response of the films is proportio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chern, J, Lai, H, Guldeste, A, Aslam, S, Wu, D, Dewhughes, D, Grovenor, C, Goringe, M, Minakovic, B
Format: Conference item
Published: 1993
_version_ 1797082578667175936
author Chern, J
Lai, H
Guldeste, A
Aslam, S
Wu, D
Dewhughes, D
Grovenor, C
Goringe, M
Minakovic, B
author_facet Chern, J
Lai, H
Guldeste, A
Aslam, S
Wu, D
Dewhughes, D
Grovenor, C
Goringe, M
Minakovic, B
author_sort Chern, J
collection OXFORD
description The distinction between the bolometric and non-bolometric responses of high Tc Ti- and Bi- oxide superconducting thin films is presented by comparison of the characteristics of the responses at different temperatures and chopping frequencies. The bolometric optical response of the films is proportional to the dR/dT of the films; experimentally the peak optical response decreases as the chopping frequency of the radiation is increased. The nonbolometric response is not proportional to the dR/dT to the films and the peak microwave response was found to be almost independent of the chopping frequency.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T01:29:55Z
format Conference item
id oxford-uuid:9340fb00-3912-4374-9519-77ce68c9c57a
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T01:29:55Z
publishDate 1993
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:9340fb00-3912-4374-9519-77ce68c9c57a2022-03-26T23:31:04ZA COMPARISON OF THE NON-BOLOMETRIC MICROWAVE RESPONSE WITH THE BOLOMETRIC OPTICAL-RESPONSE OF TL-OXIDE AND BI-OXIDE SUPERCONDUCTORSConference itemhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794uuid:9340fb00-3912-4374-9519-77ce68c9c57aSymplectic Elements at Oxford1993Chern, JLai, HGuldeste, AAslam, SWu, DDewhughes, DGrovenor, CGoringe, MMinakovic, BThe distinction between the bolometric and non-bolometric responses of high Tc Ti- and Bi- oxide superconducting thin films is presented by comparison of the characteristics of the responses at different temperatures and chopping frequencies. The bolometric optical response of the films is proportional to the dR/dT of the films; experimentally the peak optical response decreases as the chopping frequency of the radiation is increased. The nonbolometric response is not proportional to the dR/dT to the films and the peak microwave response was found to be almost independent of the chopping frequency.
spellingShingle Chern, J
Lai, H
Guldeste, A
Aslam, S
Wu, D
Dewhughes, D
Grovenor, C
Goringe, M
Minakovic, B
A COMPARISON OF THE NON-BOLOMETRIC MICROWAVE RESPONSE WITH THE BOLOMETRIC OPTICAL-RESPONSE OF TL-OXIDE AND BI-OXIDE SUPERCONDUCTORS
title A COMPARISON OF THE NON-BOLOMETRIC MICROWAVE RESPONSE WITH THE BOLOMETRIC OPTICAL-RESPONSE OF TL-OXIDE AND BI-OXIDE SUPERCONDUCTORS
title_full A COMPARISON OF THE NON-BOLOMETRIC MICROWAVE RESPONSE WITH THE BOLOMETRIC OPTICAL-RESPONSE OF TL-OXIDE AND BI-OXIDE SUPERCONDUCTORS
title_fullStr A COMPARISON OF THE NON-BOLOMETRIC MICROWAVE RESPONSE WITH THE BOLOMETRIC OPTICAL-RESPONSE OF TL-OXIDE AND BI-OXIDE SUPERCONDUCTORS
title_full_unstemmed A COMPARISON OF THE NON-BOLOMETRIC MICROWAVE RESPONSE WITH THE BOLOMETRIC OPTICAL-RESPONSE OF TL-OXIDE AND BI-OXIDE SUPERCONDUCTORS
title_short A COMPARISON OF THE NON-BOLOMETRIC MICROWAVE RESPONSE WITH THE BOLOMETRIC OPTICAL-RESPONSE OF TL-OXIDE AND BI-OXIDE SUPERCONDUCTORS
title_sort comparison of the non bolometric microwave response with the bolometric optical response of tl oxide and bi oxide superconductors
work_keys_str_mv AT chernj acomparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT laih acomparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT guldestea acomparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT aslams acomparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT wud acomparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT dewhughesd acomparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT grovenorc acomparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT goringem acomparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT minakovicb acomparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT chernj comparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT laih comparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT guldestea comparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT aslams comparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT wud comparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT dewhughesd comparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT grovenorc comparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT goringem comparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors
AT minakovicb comparisonofthenonbolometricmicrowaveresponsewiththebolometricopticalresponseoftloxideandbioxidesuperconductors