The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies
Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed r...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2007
|
| _version_ | 1797082579061440512 |
|---|---|
| author | Von Elm, E Altman, D Egger, M Pocock, S Gøtzsche, P Vandenbroucke, J |
| author_facet | Von Elm, E Altman, D Egger, M Pocock, S Gøtzsche, P Vandenbroucke, J |
| author_sort | Von Elm, E |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the websites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies. © 2007 The Authors. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T01:29:55Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:9341d170-3da5-44a0-a7f1-0c1587bff5c5 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T01:29:55Z |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:9341d170-3da5-44a0-a7f1-0c1587bff5c52022-03-26T23:31:04ZThe Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studiesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:9341d170-3da5-44a0-a7f1-0c1587bff5c5EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2007Von Elm, EAltman, DEgger, MPocock, SGøtzsche, PVandenbroucke, JMuch biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the websites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies. © 2007 The Authors. |
| spellingShingle | Von Elm, E Altman, D Egger, M Pocock, S Gøtzsche, P Vandenbroucke, J The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies |
| title | The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies |
| title_full | The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies |
| title_fullStr | The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies |
| title_short | The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies |
| title_sort | strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology strobe statement guidelines for reporting observational studies |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vonelme thestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies AT altmand thestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies AT eggerm thestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies AT pococks thestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies AT gøtzschep thestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies AT vandenbrouckej thestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies AT vonelme strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies AT altmand strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies AT eggerm strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies AT pococks strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies AT gøtzschep strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies AT vandenbrouckej strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies |