Impacts of land use intensification on human wellbeing: Evidence from ruralMozambique
Intensifying land use is often seen as a corollary of improving rural livelihoods in developing countries. However, land use intensification (LUI) frequently has unintended impacts on ecosystem services (ES), which may undermine the livelihoods of the same people who could benefit from intensificati...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2019
|
| _version_ | 1797082950210158592 |
|---|---|
| author | Smith, H Ryan, C Woollen, E Vollmer, F Keane, A Fisher, J Baumert, S Zorrilla-Miras, P Grundy, I Carvalho, M Lisboa, SN Luz, AC Patenaude, G Ribeiro, N Artur, L Mahamane, M |
| author_facet | Smith, H Ryan, C Woollen, E Vollmer, F Keane, A Fisher, J Baumert, S Zorrilla-Miras, P Grundy, I Carvalho, M Lisboa, SN Luz, AC Patenaude, G Ribeiro, N Artur, L Mahamane, M |
| author_sort | Smith, H |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Intensifying land use is often seen as a corollary of improving rural livelihoods in developing countries. However, land use intensification (LUI) frequently has unintended impacts on ecosystem services (ES), which may undermine the livelihoods of the same people who could benefit from intensification. Poorer households are disproportionately dependent on ES, so inequalities may also rise. A disaggregated analysis of LUI is thus fundamental to better understand how LUI can progress in an equitable manner. Using a suite of multi-scale, multidisciplinary socialecological methods and operationalising multidimensional concepts of land use intensity and wellbeing, we examine three case studies in rural Mozambique. Drawing on qualitative focus group discussions, 1576 household surveys and geospatial data from 27 Mozambican villages, we assess how wellbeing and inequality change with three common LUI pathways: transitions to smallholder commercial crop production, charcoal production, and subsistence expansion. Wellbeing improved with intensification of smallholder commercial and subsistence agriculture, inequality did not change. Intensification of unsustainable charcoal production showed no overall effect on either wellbeing or inequality. Improvements in wellbeing amongst the poorest households were only found with intensification of commercial crop production where villages had highly accessible markets. Our findings suggest that socioeconomic benefits from agricultural intensification and expansion may overcome localised environmental trade-offs, at least in the short term. However, unsustainable charcoal resource management and limited productive investment opportunities for rural households resulted in both reduced market access and limited wellbeing improvements. Sustainable and inclusive markets are therefore crucial developments alongside LUI to sustain wellbeing improvements for all households, to ensure that no one is left behind. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T01:35:11Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:94edcad8-ec56-4d8f-88ca-a72adbb2e232 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T01:35:11Z |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:94edcad8-ec56-4d8f-88ca-a72adbb2e2322022-03-26T23:42:46ZImpacts of land use intensification on human wellbeing: Evidence from ruralMozambiqueJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:94edcad8-ec56-4d8f-88ca-a72adbb2e232EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2019Smith, HRyan, CWoollen, EVollmer, FKeane, AFisher, JBaumert, SZorrilla-Miras, PGrundy, ICarvalho, MLisboa, SNLuz, ACPatenaude, GRibeiro, NArtur, LMahamane, MIntensifying land use is often seen as a corollary of improving rural livelihoods in developing countries. However, land use intensification (LUI) frequently has unintended impacts on ecosystem services (ES), which may undermine the livelihoods of the same people who could benefit from intensification. Poorer households are disproportionately dependent on ES, so inequalities may also rise. A disaggregated analysis of LUI is thus fundamental to better understand how LUI can progress in an equitable manner. Using a suite of multi-scale, multidisciplinary socialecological methods and operationalising multidimensional concepts of land use intensity and wellbeing, we examine three case studies in rural Mozambique. Drawing on qualitative focus group discussions, 1576 household surveys and geospatial data from 27 Mozambican villages, we assess how wellbeing and inequality change with three common LUI pathways: transitions to smallholder commercial crop production, charcoal production, and subsistence expansion. Wellbeing improved with intensification of smallholder commercial and subsistence agriculture, inequality did not change. Intensification of unsustainable charcoal production showed no overall effect on either wellbeing or inequality. Improvements in wellbeing amongst the poorest households were only found with intensification of commercial crop production where villages had highly accessible markets. Our findings suggest that socioeconomic benefits from agricultural intensification and expansion may overcome localised environmental trade-offs, at least in the short term. However, unsustainable charcoal resource management and limited productive investment opportunities for rural households resulted in both reduced market access and limited wellbeing improvements. Sustainable and inclusive markets are therefore crucial developments alongside LUI to sustain wellbeing improvements for all households, to ensure that no one is left behind. |
| spellingShingle | Smith, H Ryan, C Woollen, E Vollmer, F Keane, A Fisher, J Baumert, S Zorrilla-Miras, P Grundy, I Carvalho, M Lisboa, SN Luz, AC Patenaude, G Ribeiro, N Artur, L Mahamane, M Impacts of land use intensification on human wellbeing: Evidence from ruralMozambique |
| title | Impacts of land use intensification on human wellbeing: Evidence from ruralMozambique |
| title_full | Impacts of land use intensification on human wellbeing: Evidence from ruralMozambique |
| title_fullStr | Impacts of land use intensification on human wellbeing: Evidence from ruralMozambique |
| title_full_unstemmed | Impacts of land use intensification on human wellbeing: Evidence from ruralMozambique |
| title_short | Impacts of land use intensification on human wellbeing: Evidence from ruralMozambique |
| title_sort | impacts of land use intensification on human wellbeing evidence from ruralmozambique |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT smithh impactsoflanduseintensificationonhumanwellbeingevidencefromruralmozambique AT ryanc impactsoflanduseintensificationonhumanwellbeingevidencefromruralmozambique AT woollene impactsoflanduseintensificationonhumanwellbeingevidencefromruralmozambique AT vollmerf impactsoflanduseintensificationonhumanwellbeingevidencefromruralmozambique AT keanea impactsoflanduseintensificationonhumanwellbeingevidencefromruralmozambique AT fisherj impactsoflanduseintensificationonhumanwellbeingevidencefromruralmozambique AT baumerts impactsoflanduseintensificationonhumanwellbeingevidencefromruralmozambique AT zorrillamirasp impactsoflanduseintensificationonhumanwellbeingevidencefromruralmozambique AT grundyi impactsoflanduseintensificationonhumanwellbeingevidencefromruralmozambique AT carvalhom impactsoflanduseintensificationonhumanwellbeingevidencefromruralmozambique AT lisboasn impactsoflanduseintensificationonhumanwellbeingevidencefromruralmozambique AT luzac impactsoflanduseintensificationonhumanwellbeingevidencefromruralmozambique AT patenaudeg impactsoflanduseintensificationonhumanwellbeingevidencefromruralmozambique AT ribeiron impactsoflanduseintensificationonhumanwellbeingevidencefromruralmozambique AT arturl impactsoflanduseintensificationonhumanwellbeingevidencefromruralmozambique AT mahamanem impactsoflanduseintensificationonhumanwellbeingevidencefromruralmozambique |