Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice.

Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice.

Show other versions (1)

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Glasziou, P, Chalmers, I, Altman, D, Bastian, H, Boutron, I, Brice, A, Jamtvedt, G, Farmer, A, Ghersi, D, Groves, T, Heneghan, C, Hill, S, Lewin, S, Michie, S, Perera, R, Pomeroy, V, Tilson, J, Shepperd, S, Williams, J
Format:	Journal article
Published:	2010

Similar Items

Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice.
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2010)

From trial to practice Authors' reply
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2010)

Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide.
by: Hoffmann, T, et al.
Published: (2014)

Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?
by: Bastian, H, et al.
Published: (2010)

Mobile‐based technologies to support healthcare provider to healthcare provider communication and management of care
by: Gonçalves-Bradley, DC, et al.
Published: (2018)

Mobile technologies to support healthcare provider to healthcare provider communication and management of care
by: Gonçalves-Bradley, DC, et al.
Published: (2020)

Taking Off with AI: Lessons from Aviation for Healthcare
by: Bondi-Kelly, Elizabeth, et al.
Published: (2023)

The moral permissibility of perspective-taking interventions
by: Read, H, et al.
Published: (2023)

A research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about complex interventions.
by: Noyes, J, et al.
Published: (2013)

A research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about complex interventions
by: Noyes, J, et al.
Published: (2013)

Graphical method for depicting randomised trials of complex interventions.
by: Perera, R, et al.
Published: (2007)

What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2008)

What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2008)

Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions?
by: Shepperd, S, et al.
Published: (2009)

Mobile‐based technologies to support client to healthcare provider communication and management of care
by: Gonsalves-Bradley, DC, et al.
Published: (2018)

Taking tablets for chronic illness: where next?
by: Farmer, A
Published: (2008)

Faithful but flexible: Intervention fidelity in clinical trials of complex interventions in healthcare
by: Paez, A
Published: (2023)

PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts.
by: Beller, E, et al.
Published: (2013)

Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews.
by: Song, F, et al.
Published: (2009)

Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research.
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2014)

Assessing risk of bias in studies that evaluate health care interventions: recommendations in the misinformation age
by: Page, M, et al.
Published: (2018)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration.
by: Turner, L, et al.
Published: (2013)

Reminder packaging for improving adherence to self-administered long-term medications.
by: Heneghan, C, et al.
Published: (2006)

Where next for evidence based healthcare?
by: Heneghan, C, et al.
Published: (2013)

Critical thinking in healthcare and education.
by: Sharples, J, et al.
Published: (2017)

Interventions to improve teamwork and communications among healthcare staff.
by: McCulloch, P, et al.
Published: (2011)

The Knowledge-to-Action Cycle: Monitoring and evaluating knowledge: Framework for evaluating complex interventions
by: Shepperd, S
Published: (2009)

Identifying, documenting, and examining heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions
by: Pigott, T, et al.
Published: (2013)

Identifying, documenting, and examining heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions.
by: Pigott, T, et al.
Published: (2013)

Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocol
by: Blanco, D, et al.
Published: (2017)

Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2014)

Accumulating research: a systematic account of how cumulative meta-analyses would have provided knowledge, improved health, reduced harm and saved resources
by: Clarke, M, et al.
Published: (2014)

Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited
by: Lazarus, C, et al.
Published: (2016)

Educational training intervention on workplace violence among healthcare workers
by: Ibrahim, Mohd Safwan, et al.
Published: (2019)

Ethics review roulette: what can we learn?
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2004)

Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.
by: Chalmers, I, et al.
Published: (2009)

Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.
by: Chalmers, I, et al.
Published: (2009)

Enhancing the usability of systematic reviews by improving the consideration and description of interventions
by: Hoffmann, T, et al.
Published: (2017)

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.
by: Liberati, A, et al.
Published: (2009)

Implementation of a nurse-led behaviour change intervention to support medication taking in type 2 diabetes: beyond hypothesised active ingredients (SAMS Consultation Study).
by: Hardeman, W, et al.
Published: (2014)