What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies.
BACKGROUND: A commonly reported problem with the conduct of multicentre randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is that recruitment is often slower or more difficult than expected, with many trials failing to reach their planned sample size within the timescale and funding originally envisaged. The aim...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2006
|
| _version_ | 1826286062835597312 |
|---|---|
| author | McDonald, A Knight, R Campbell, M Entwistle, V Grant, A Cook, J Elbourne, DR Francis, D Garcia, J Roberts, I Snowdon, C |
| author_facet | McDonald, A Knight, R Campbell, M Entwistle, V Grant, A Cook, J Elbourne, DR Francis, D Garcia, J Roberts, I Snowdon, C |
| author_sort | McDonald, A |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | BACKGROUND: A commonly reported problem with the conduct of multicentre randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is that recruitment is often slower or more difficult than expected, with many trials failing to reach their planned sample size within the timescale and funding originally envisaged. The aim of this study was to explore factors that may have been associated with good and poor recruitment in a cohort of multicentre trials funded by two public bodies: the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme. METHODS: The cohort of trials was identified from the administrative databases held by the two funding bodies. 114 trials that recruited participants between 1994 and 2002 met the inclusion criteria. The full scientific applications and subsequent trial reports submitted by the trial teams to the funders provided the principal data sources. Associations between trial characteristics and recruitment success were tested using the Chi-squared test, or Fisher's exact test where appropriate. RESULTS: Less than a third (31%) of the trials achieved their original recruitment target and half (53%) were awarded an extension. The proportion achieving targets did not appear to improve over time. The overall start to recruitment was delayed in 47 (41%) trials and early recruitment problems were identified in 77 (63%) trials. The inter-relationship between trial features and recruitment success was complex. A variety of strategies were employed to try to increase recruitment, but their success could not be assessed. CONCLUSION: Recruitment problems are complex and challenging. Many of the trials in the cohort experienced recruitment difficulties. Trials often required extended recruitment periods (sometimes supported by additional funds). While this is of continuing concern, success in addressing the trial question may be more important than recruitment alone. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T01:38:13Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:95ec3911-624f-440d-9106-c84f3755cc14 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T01:38:13Z |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:95ec3911-624f-440d-9106-c84f3755cc142022-03-26T23:49:35ZWhat influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:95ec3911-624f-440d-9106-c84f3755cc14EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2006McDonald, AKnight, RCampbell, MEntwistle, VGrant, ACook, JElbourne, DRFrancis, DGarcia, JRoberts, ISnowdon, CBACKGROUND: A commonly reported problem with the conduct of multicentre randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is that recruitment is often slower or more difficult than expected, with many trials failing to reach their planned sample size within the timescale and funding originally envisaged. The aim of this study was to explore factors that may have been associated with good and poor recruitment in a cohort of multicentre trials funded by two public bodies: the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme. METHODS: The cohort of trials was identified from the administrative databases held by the two funding bodies. 114 trials that recruited participants between 1994 and 2002 met the inclusion criteria. The full scientific applications and subsequent trial reports submitted by the trial teams to the funders provided the principal data sources. Associations between trial characteristics and recruitment success were tested using the Chi-squared test, or Fisher's exact test where appropriate. RESULTS: Less than a third (31%) of the trials achieved their original recruitment target and half (53%) were awarded an extension. The proportion achieving targets did not appear to improve over time. The overall start to recruitment was delayed in 47 (41%) trials and early recruitment problems were identified in 77 (63%) trials. The inter-relationship between trial features and recruitment success was complex. A variety of strategies were employed to try to increase recruitment, but their success could not be assessed. CONCLUSION: Recruitment problems are complex and challenging. Many of the trials in the cohort experienced recruitment difficulties. Trials often required extended recruitment periods (sometimes supported by additional funds). While this is of continuing concern, success in addressing the trial question may be more important than recruitment alone. |
| spellingShingle | McDonald, A Knight, R Campbell, M Entwistle, V Grant, A Cook, J Elbourne, DR Francis, D Garcia, J Roberts, I Snowdon, C What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. |
| title | What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. |
| title_full | What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. |
| title_fullStr | What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. |
| title_full_unstemmed | What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. |
| title_short | What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. |
| title_sort | what influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials a review of trials funded by two uk funding agencies |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mcdonalda whatinfluencesrecruitmenttorandomisedcontrolledtrialsareviewoftrialsfundedbytwoukfundingagencies AT knightr whatinfluencesrecruitmenttorandomisedcontrolledtrialsareviewoftrialsfundedbytwoukfundingagencies AT campbellm whatinfluencesrecruitmenttorandomisedcontrolledtrialsareviewoftrialsfundedbytwoukfundingagencies AT entwistlev whatinfluencesrecruitmenttorandomisedcontrolledtrialsareviewoftrialsfundedbytwoukfundingagencies AT granta whatinfluencesrecruitmenttorandomisedcontrolledtrialsareviewoftrialsfundedbytwoukfundingagencies AT cookj whatinfluencesrecruitmenttorandomisedcontrolledtrialsareviewoftrialsfundedbytwoukfundingagencies AT elbournedr whatinfluencesrecruitmenttorandomisedcontrolledtrialsareviewoftrialsfundedbytwoukfundingagencies AT francisd whatinfluencesrecruitmenttorandomisedcontrolledtrialsareviewoftrialsfundedbytwoukfundingagencies AT garciaj whatinfluencesrecruitmenttorandomisedcontrolledtrialsareviewoftrialsfundedbytwoukfundingagencies AT robertsi whatinfluencesrecruitmenttorandomisedcontrolledtrialsareviewoftrialsfundedbytwoukfundingagencies AT snowdonc whatinfluencesrecruitmenttorandomisedcontrolledtrialsareviewoftrialsfundedbytwoukfundingagencies |