Unreliable Evidence: 2 Sources of Uncertainty During Perceptual Choice.

Perceptual decisions often involve integrating evidence from multiple concurrently available sources. Uncertainty arises when the integrated (mean) evidence fails to support one alternative over another. However, evidence heterogeneity (variability) also provokes uncertainty. Here, we asked whether...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael, E, de Gardelle, V, Nevado-Holgado, A, Summerfield, C
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2013
_version_ 1797083576171233280
author Michael, E
de Gardelle, V
Nevado-Holgado, A
Summerfield, C
author_facet Michael, E
de Gardelle, V
Nevado-Holgado, A
Summerfield, C
author_sort Michael, E
collection OXFORD
description Perceptual decisions often involve integrating evidence from multiple concurrently available sources. Uncertainty arises when the integrated (mean) evidence fails to support one alternative over another. However, evidence heterogeneity (variability) also provokes uncertainty. Here, we asked whether these 2 sources of uncertainty have independent behavioral and neural effects during choice. Human observers undergoing functional neuroimaging judged the average color or shape of a multielement array. The mean and variance of the feature values exerted independent influences on behavior and brain activity. Surprisingly, BOLD signals in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) showed polar opposite responses to the 2 sources of uncertainty, with the strongest response to ambiguous tallies of evidence (high mean uncertainty) and to homogenous arrays (low variance uncertainty). These findings present a challenge for models that emphasize the role of the dmPFC in detecting conflict, errors, or surprise. We suggest an alternative explanation, whereby evidence is processed with increased gain near the category boundary.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T01:43:26Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:979abbde-e44f-4466-a165-1acf3f94e615
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T01:43:26Z
publishDate 2013
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:979abbde-e44f-4466-a165-1acf3f94e6152022-03-27T00:01:04ZUnreliable Evidence: 2 Sources of Uncertainty During Perceptual Choice.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:979abbde-e44f-4466-a165-1acf3f94e615EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2013Michael, Ede Gardelle, VNevado-Holgado, ASummerfield, CPerceptual decisions often involve integrating evidence from multiple concurrently available sources. Uncertainty arises when the integrated (mean) evidence fails to support one alternative over another. However, evidence heterogeneity (variability) also provokes uncertainty. Here, we asked whether these 2 sources of uncertainty have independent behavioral and neural effects during choice. Human observers undergoing functional neuroimaging judged the average color or shape of a multielement array. The mean and variance of the feature values exerted independent influences on behavior and brain activity. Surprisingly, BOLD signals in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) showed polar opposite responses to the 2 sources of uncertainty, with the strongest response to ambiguous tallies of evidence (high mean uncertainty) and to homogenous arrays (low variance uncertainty). These findings present a challenge for models that emphasize the role of the dmPFC in detecting conflict, errors, or surprise. We suggest an alternative explanation, whereby evidence is processed with increased gain near the category boundary.
spellingShingle Michael, E
de Gardelle, V
Nevado-Holgado, A
Summerfield, C
Unreliable Evidence: 2 Sources of Uncertainty During Perceptual Choice.
title Unreliable Evidence: 2 Sources of Uncertainty During Perceptual Choice.
title_full Unreliable Evidence: 2 Sources of Uncertainty During Perceptual Choice.
title_fullStr Unreliable Evidence: 2 Sources of Uncertainty During Perceptual Choice.
title_full_unstemmed Unreliable Evidence: 2 Sources of Uncertainty During Perceptual Choice.
title_short Unreliable Evidence: 2 Sources of Uncertainty During Perceptual Choice.
title_sort unreliable evidence 2 sources of uncertainty during perceptual choice
work_keys_str_mv AT michaele unreliableevidence2sourcesofuncertaintyduringperceptualchoice
AT degardellev unreliableevidence2sourcesofuncertaintyduringperceptualchoice
AT nevadoholgadoa unreliableevidence2sourcesofuncertaintyduringperceptualchoice
AT summerfieldc unreliableevidence2sourcesofuncertaintyduringperceptualchoice