Response to Westlund's commentary: 'Can conditioned reinforcers and variable-Ratio Schedules make food- and fluid control redundant?'
In this short communication, we respond to Westlund's critique of the NC3Rs Working Group report on refinement of the use of food and fluid control as motivational tools for macaques used in behavioural neuroscience research. The suggestions Westlund makes - in particular, the use of conditione...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
_version_ | 1797083704926928896 |
---|---|
author | Prescott, M Brown, V Flecknell, P Garrod, K Lemon, R Parker, A Ryder, K Schultz, W Scott, L Watson, J Whitfield, L |
author_facet | Prescott, M Brown, V Flecknell, P Garrod, K Lemon, R Parker, A Ryder, K Schultz, W Scott, L Watson, J Whitfield, L |
author_sort | Prescott, M |
collection | OXFORD |
description | In this short communication, we respond to Westlund's critique of the NC3Rs Working Group report on refinement of the use of food and fluid control as motivational tools for macaques used in behavioural neuroscience research. The suggestions Westlund makes - in particular, the use of conditioned reinforcers and variable ratio schedules - were considered by the Working Group but were not included in the report as specific recommendations. We outline the reasons for this and also address some misunderstandings of our position. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T01:45:14Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:982e92a0-b3fe-4430-9f6d-f6fdf6eb1cf1 |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T01:45:14Z |
publishDate | 2012 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:982e92a0-b3fe-4430-9f6d-f6fdf6eb1cf12022-03-27T00:05:19ZResponse to Westlund's commentary: 'Can conditioned reinforcers and variable-Ratio Schedules make food- and fluid control redundant?'Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:982e92a0-b3fe-4430-9f6d-f6fdf6eb1cf1EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Prescott, MBrown, VFlecknell, PGarrod, KLemon, RParker, ARyder, KSchultz, WScott, LWatson, JWhitfield, LIn this short communication, we respond to Westlund's critique of the NC3Rs Working Group report on refinement of the use of food and fluid control as motivational tools for macaques used in behavioural neuroscience research. The suggestions Westlund makes - in particular, the use of conditioned reinforcers and variable ratio schedules - were considered by the Working Group but were not included in the report as specific recommendations. We outline the reasons for this and also address some misunderstandings of our position. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. |
spellingShingle | Prescott, M Brown, V Flecknell, P Garrod, K Lemon, R Parker, A Ryder, K Schultz, W Scott, L Watson, J Whitfield, L Response to Westlund's commentary: 'Can conditioned reinforcers and variable-Ratio Schedules make food- and fluid control redundant?' |
title | Response to Westlund's commentary: 'Can conditioned reinforcers and variable-Ratio Schedules make food- and fluid control redundant?' |
title_full | Response to Westlund's commentary: 'Can conditioned reinforcers and variable-Ratio Schedules make food- and fluid control redundant?' |
title_fullStr | Response to Westlund's commentary: 'Can conditioned reinforcers and variable-Ratio Schedules make food- and fluid control redundant?' |
title_full_unstemmed | Response to Westlund's commentary: 'Can conditioned reinforcers and variable-Ratio Schedules make food- and fluid control redundant?' |
title_short | Response to Westlund's commentary: 'Can conditioned reinforcers and variable-Ratio Schedules make food- and fluid control redundant?' |
title_sort | response to westlund s commentary can conditioned reinforcers and variable ratio schedules make food and fluid control redundant |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prescottm responsetowestlundscommentarycanconditionedreinforcersandvariableratioschedulesmakefoodandfluidcontrolredundant AT brownv responsetowestlundscommentarycanconditionedreinforcersandvariableratioschedulesmakefoodandfluidcontrolredundant AT flecknellp responsetowestlundscommentarycanconditionedreinforcersandvariableratioschedulesmakefoodandfluidcontrolredundant AT garrodk responsetowestlundscommentarycanconditionedreinforcersandvariableratioschedulesmakefoodandfluidcontrolredundant AT lemonr responsetowestlundscommentarycanconditionedreinforcersandvariableratioschedulesmakefoodandfluidcontrolredundant AT parkera responsetowestlundscommentarycanconditionedreinforcersandvariableratioschedulesmakefoodandfluidcontrolredundant AT ryderk responsetowestlundscommentarycanconditionedreinforcersandvariableratioschedulesmakefoodandfluidcontrolredundant AT schultzw responsetowestlundscommentarycanconditionedreinforcersandvariableratioschedulesmakefoodandfluidcontrolredundant AT scottl responsetowestlundscommentarycanconditionedreinforcersandvariableratioschedulesmakefoodandfluidcontrolredundant AT watsonj responsetowestlundscommentarycanconditionedreinforcersandvariableratioschedulesmakefoodandfluidcontrolredundant AT whitfieldl responsetowestlundscommentarycanconditionedreinforcersandvariableratioschedulesmakefoodandfluidcontrolredundant |