‘If we don't have consent, we need to have beneficence’: requiring beneficence in nonconsensual neurocorrection
Neurointerventions—interventions that cause direct physical, chemical or biological effects on the brain—are sometimes administered to criminal offenders for the purpose of reducing their recidivism risk and promoting their rehabilitation more generally. Ethical debate on this practice (henceforth c...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | Dore-Horgan, E |
---|---|
Μορφή: | Journal article |
Γλώσσα: | English |
Έκδοση: |
Wiley
2022
|
Παρόμοια τεκμήρια
Παρόμοια τεκμήρια
-
The expressivist objection to nonconsensual neurocorrectives
ανά: De Marco, G, κ.ά.
Έκδοση: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives, bypassing, and free action
ανά: De Marco, G
Έκδοση: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives and bodily integrity: a reply to Shaw and Barn
ανά: Douglas, T
Έκδοση: (2016) -
Neurocorrection: an offender-oriented defence
ανά: Dore-Horgan, E
Έκδοση: (2022) -
Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.
ανά: Savulescu, J
Έκδοση: (2001)