‘If we don't have consent, we need to have beneficence’: requiring beneficence in nonconsensual neurocorrection
Neurointerventions—interventions that cause direct physical, chemical or biological effects on the brain—are sometimes administered to criminal offenders for the purpose of reducing their recidivism risk and promoting their rehabilitation more generally. Ethical debate on this practice (henceforth c...
Main Author: | Dore-Horgan, E |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2022
|
Similar Items
-
The expressivist objection to nonconsensual neurocorrectives
by: De Marco, G, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives, bypassing, and free action
by: De Marco, G
Published: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives and bodily integrity: a reply to Shaw and Barn
by: Douglas, T
Published: (2016) -
Neurocorrection: an offender-oriented defence
by: Dore-Horgan, E
Published: (2022) -
Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.
by: Savulescu, J
Published: (2001)