‘If we don't have consent, we need to have beneficence’: requiring beneficence in nonconsensual neurocorrection
Neurointerventions—interventions that cause direct physical, chemical or biological effects on the brain—are sometimes administered to criminal offenders for the purpose of reducing their recidivism risk and promoting their rehabilitation more generally. Ethical debate on this practice (henceforth c...
Auteur principal: | Dore-Horgan, E |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Langue: | English |
Publié: |
Wiley
2022
|
Documents similaires
-
The expressivist objection to nonconsensual neurocorrectives
par: De Marco, G, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives, bypassing, and free action
par: De Marco, G
Publié: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives and bodily integrity: a reply to Shaw and Barn
par: Douglas, T
Publié: (2016) -
Neurocorrection: an offender-oriented defence
par: Dore-Horgan, E
Publié: (2022) -
Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.
par: Savulescu, J
Publié: (2001)