‘If we don't have consent, we need to have beneficence’: requiring beneficence in nonconsensual neurocorrection
Neurointerventions—interventions that cause direct physical, chemical or biological effects on the brain—are sometimes administered to criminal offenders for the purpose of reducing their recidivism risk and promoting their rehabilitation more generally. Ethical debate on this practice (henceforth c...
Autore principale: | Dore-Horgan, E |
---|---|
Natura: | Journal article |
Lingua: | English |
Pubblicazione: |
Wiley
2022
|
Documenti analoghi
Documenti analoghi
-
The expressivist objection to nonconsensual neurocorrectives
di: De Marco, G, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives, bypassing, and free action
di: De Marco, G
Pubblicazione: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives and bodily integrity: a reply to Shaw and Barn
di: Douglas, T
Pubblicazione: (2016) -
Neurocorrection: an offender-oriented defence
di: Dore-Horgan, E
Pubblicazione: (2022) -
Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.
di: Savulescu, J
Pubblicazione: (2001)