‘If we don't have consent, we need to have beneficence’: requiring beneficence in nonconsensual neurocorrection
Neurointerventions—interventions that cause direct physical, chemical or biological effects on the brain—are sometimes administered to criminal offenders for the purpose of reducing their recidivism risk and promoting their rehabilitation more generally. Ethical debate on this practice (henceforth c...
Hoofdauteur: | Dore-Horgan, E |
---|---|
Formaat: | Journal article |
Taal: | English |
Gepubliceerd in: |
Wiley
2022
|
Gelijkaardige items
-
The expressivist objection to nonconsensual neurocorrectives
door: De Marco, G, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives, bypassing, and free action
door: De Marco, G
Gepubliceerd in: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives and bodily integrity: a reply to Shaw and Barn
door: Douglas, T
Gepubliceerd in: (2016) -
Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.
door: Savulescu, J
Gepubliceerd in: (2001) -
Neurocorrection: an offender-oriented defence
door: Dore-Horgan, E
Gepubliceerd in: (2022)