‘If we don't have consent, we need to have beneficence’: requiring beneficence in nonconsensual neurocorrection
Neurointerventions—interventions that cause direct physical, chemical or biological effects on the brain—are sometimes administered to criminal offenders for the purpose of reducing their recidivism risk and promoting their rehabilitation more generally. Ethical debate on this practice (henceforth c...
Autor principal: | Dore-Horgan, E |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicado em: |
Wiley
2022
|
Registos relacionados
-
The expressivist objection to nonconsensual neurocorrectives
Por: De Marco, G, et al.
Publicado em: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives, bypassing, and free action
Por: De Marco, G
Publicado em: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives and bodily integrity: a reply to Shaw and Barn
Por: Douglas, T
Publicado em: (2016) -
Neurocorrection: an offender-oriented defence
Por: Dore-Horgan, E
Publicado em: (2022) -
Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.
Por: Savulescu, J
Publicado em: (2001)