‘If we don't have consent, we need to have beneficence’: requiring beneficence in nonconsensual neurocorrection
Neurointerventions—interventions that cause direct physical, chemical or biological effects on the brain—are sometimes administered to criminal offenders for the purpose of reducing their recidivism risk and promoting their rehabilitation more generally. Ethical debate on this practice (henceforth c...
Главный автор: | Dore-Horgan, E |
---|---|
Формат: | Journal article |
Язык: | English |
Опубликовано: |
Wiley
2022
|
Схожие документы
-
The expressivist objection to nonconsensual neurocorrectives
по: De Marco, G, и др.
Опубликовано: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives, bypassing, and free action
по: De Marco, G
Опубликовано: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives and bodily integrity: a reply to Shaw and Barn
по: Douglas, T
Опубликовано: (2016) -
Neurocorrection: an offender-oriented defence
по: Dore-Horgan, E
Опубликовано: (2022) -
Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.
по: Savulescu, J
Опубликовано: (2001)