‘If we don't have consent, we need to have beneficence’: requiring beneficence in nonconsensual neurocorrection
Neurointerventions—interventions that cause direct physical, chemical or biological effects on the brain—are sometimes administered to criminal offenders for the purpose of reducing their recidivism risk and promoting their rehabilitation more generally. Ethical debate on this practice (henceforth c...
Yazar: | Dore-Horgan, E |
---|---|
Materyal Türü: | Journal article |
Dil: | English |
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
Wiley
2022
|
Benzer Materyaller
-
The expressivist objection to nonconsensual neurocorrectives
Yazar:: De Marco, G, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives, bypassing, and free action
Yazar:: De Marco, G
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives and bodily integrity: a reply to Shaw and Barn
Yazar:: Douglas, T
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2016) -
Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.
Yazar:: Savulescu, J
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2001) -
Neurocorrection: an offender-oriented defence
Yazar:: Dore-Horgan, E
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2022)