‘If we don't have consent, we need to have beneficence’: requiring beneficence in nonconsensual neurocorrection
Neurointerventions—interventions that cause direct physical, chemical or biological effects on the brain—are sometimes administered to criminal offenders for the purpose of reducing their recidivism risk and promoting their rehabilitation more generally. Ethical debate on this practice (henceforth c...
Автор: | Dore-Horgan, E |
---|---|
Формат: | Journal article |
Мова: | English |
Опубліковано: |
Wiley
2022
|
Схожі ресурси
Схожі ресурси
-
The expressivist objection to nonconsensual neurocorrectives
за авторством: De Marco, G, та інші
Опубліковано: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives, bypassing, and free action
за авторством: De Marco, G
Опубліковано: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives and bodily integrity: a reply to Shaw and Barn
за авторством: Douglas, T
Опубліковано: (2016) -
Neurocorrection: an offender-oriented defence
за авторством: Dore-Horgan, E
Опубліковано: (2022) -
Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.
за авторством: Savulescu, J
Опубліковано: (2001)