Recurrent reciprocal deletions and duplications of 16p13.11: the deletion is a risk factor for MR/MCA while the duplication may be a rare benign variant
Background: Genomic disorders are often caused by non-allelic homologous recombination between segmental duplications. Chromosome 16 is especially rich in a chromosome-specific low copy repeat, termed LCR16. Methods and Results: A bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) array comparative genome hybrid...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| פורמט: | Journal article |
| שפה: | English |
| יצא לאור: |
2009
|
| _version_ | 1826286820638326784 |
|---|---|
| author | Hannes, F Sharp, A Mefford, H de Ravel, T Ruivenkamp, C Breuning, M Fryns, J Devriendt, K Van Buggenhout, G Vogels, A Stewart, H Hennekam, R Cooper, G Regan, R Knight, S Eichler, E Vermeesch, JR |
| author_facet | Hannes, F Sharp, A Mefford, H de Ravel, T Ruivenkamp, C Breuning, M Fryns, J Devriendt, K Van Buggenhout, G Vogels, A Stewart, H Hennekam, R Cooper, G Regan, R Knight, S Eichler, E Vermeesch, JR |
| author_sort | Hannes, F |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Background: Genomic disorders are often caused by non-allelic homologous recombination between segmental duplications. Chromosome 16 is especially rich in a chromosome-specific low copy repeat, termed LCR16. Methods and Results: A bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) array comparative genome hybridisation (CGH) screen of 1027 patients with mental retardation and/or multiple congenital anomalies (MR/MCA) was performed. The BAC array CGH screen identified five patients with deletions and five with apparently reciprocal duplications of 16p13 covering 1.65 Mb, including 15 RefSeq genes. In addition, three atypical rearrangements overlapping or flanking this region were found. Fine mapping by highresolution oligonucleotide arrays suggests that these deletions and duplications result from non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) between distinct LCR16 subunits with.99% sequence identity. Deletions and duplications were either de novo or inherited from unaffected parents. To determine whether these imbalances are associated with the MR/MCA phenotype or whether they might be benign variants, a population of 2014 normal controls was screened. The absence of deletions in the control population showed that 16p13.11 deletions are significantly associated with MR/MCA (p = 0.0048). Despite phenotypic variability, common features were identified: three patients with deletions presented with MR, microcephaly and epilepsy (two of these had also short stature), and two other deletion carriers ascertained prenatally presented with cleft lip and midline defects. In contrast to its previous association with autism, the duplication seems to be a common variant in the population (5/1682, 0.29%). Conclusion: These findings indicate that deletions inherited from clinically normal parents are likely to be causal for the patients' phenotype whereas the role of duplications (de novo or inherited) in the phenotype remains uncertain. This difference in knowledge regarding the clinical relevance of the deletion and the duplication causes a paradigm shift in (cyto)genetic counselling. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T01:49:24Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:998d0f92-a858-4f78-bae8-87f3fd9da5f9 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T01:49:24Z |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:998d0f92-a858-4f78-bae8-87f3fd9da5f92022-03-27T00:15:08ZRecurrent reciprocal deletions and duplications of 16p13.11: the deletion is a risk factor for MR/MCA while the duplication may be a rare benign variantJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:998d0f92-a858-4f78-bae8-87f3fd9da5f9EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2009Hannes, FSharp, AMefford, Hde Ravel, TRuivenkamp, CBreuning, MFryns, JDevriendt, KVan Buggenhout, GVogels, AStewart, HHennekam, RCooper, GRegan, RKnight, SEichler, EVermeesch, JRBackground: Genomic disorders are often caused by non-allelic homologous recombination between segmental duplications. Chromosome 16 is especially rich in a chromosome-specific low copy repeat, termed LCR16. Methods and Results: A bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) array comparative genome hybridisation (CGH) screen of 1027 patients with mental retardation and/or multiple congenital anomalies (MR/MCA) was performed. The BAC array CGH screen identified five patients with deletions and five with apparently reciprocal duplications of 16p13 covering 1.65 Mb, including 15 RefSeq genes. In addition, three atypical rearrangements overlapping or flanking this region were found. Fine mapping by highresolution oligonucleotide arrays suggests that these deletions and duplications result from non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) between distinct LCR16 subunits with.99% sequence identity. Deletions and duplications were either de novo or inherited from unaffected parents. To determine whether these imbalances are associated with the MR/MCA phenotype or whether they might be benign variants, a population of 2014 normal controls was screened. The absence of deletions in the control population showed that 16p13.11 deletions are significantly associated with MR/MCA (p = 0.0048). Despite phenotypic variability, common features were identified: three patients with deletions presented with MR, microcephaly and epilepsy (two of these had also short stature), and two other deletion carriers ascertained prenatally presented with cleft lip and midline defects. In contrast to its previous association with autism, the duplication seems to be a common variant in the population (5/1682, 0.29%). Conclusion: These findings indicate that deletions inherited from clinically normal parents are likely to be causal for the patients' phenotype whereas the role of duplications (de novo or inherited) in the phenotype remains uncertain. This difference in knowledge regarding the clinical relevance of the deletion and the duplication causes a paradigm shift in (cyto)genetic counselling. |
| spellingShingle | Hannes, F Sharp, A Mefford, H de Ravel, T Ruivenkamp, C Breuning, M Fryns, J Devriendt, K Van Buggenhout, G Vogels, A Stewart, H Hennekam, R Cooper, G Regan, R Knight, S Eichler, E Vermeesch, JR Recurrent reciprocal deletions and duplications of 16p13.11: the deletion is a risk factor for MR/MCA while the duplication may be a rare benign variant |
| title | Recurrent reciprocal deletions and duplications of 16p13.11: the deletion is a risk factor for MR/MCA while the duplication may be a rare benign variant |
| title_full | Recurrent reciprocal deletions and duplications of 16p13.11: the deletion is a risk factor for MR/MCA while the duplication may be a rare benign variant |
| title_fullStr | Recurrent reciprocal deletions and duplications of 16p13.11: the deletion is a risk factor for MR/MCA while the duplication may be a rare benign variant |
| title_full_unstemmed | Recurrent reciprocal deletions and duplications of 16p13.11: the deletion is a risk factor for MR/MCA while the duplication may be a rare benign variant |
| title_short | Recurrent reciprocal deletions and duplications of 16p13.11: the deletion is a risk factor for MR/MCA while the duplication may be a rare benign variant |
| title_sort | recurrent reciprocal deletions and duplications of 16p13 11 the deletion is a risk factor for mr mca while the duplication may be a rare benign variant |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hannesf recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant AT sharpa recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant AT meffordh recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant AT deravelt recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant AT ruivenkampc recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant AT breuningm recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant AT frynsj recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant AT devriendtk recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant AT vanbuggenhoutg recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant AT vogelsa recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant AT stewarth recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant AT hennekamr recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant AT cooperg recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant AT reganr recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant AT knights recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant AT eichlere recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant AT vermeeschjr recurrentreciprocaldeletionsandduplicationsof16p1311thedeletionisariskfactorformrmcawhiletheduplicationmaybeararebenignvariant |