Human-centric AI: philosophical and community-centric considerations
This article provides a course of correction in the discourse surrounding human-centric AI by elucidating the philosophical underpinning that serves to create a view that AI is divorced from human-centric values. Next, we espouse the need to explicitly designate stakeholder- or community-centric val...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer
2023
|
| _version_ | 1811141341144416256 |
|---|---|
| author | Taylor, RR O’Dell, B Murphy, JW |
| author_facet | Taylor, RR O’Dell, B Murphy, JW |
| author_sort | Taylor, RR |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | This article provides a course of correction in the discourse surrounding human-centric AI by elucidating the philosophical underpinning that serves to create a view that AI is divorced from human-centric values. Next, we espouse the need to explicitly designate stakeholder- or community-centric values which are needed to resolve the issue of alignment. To achieve this, we present two frameworks, Ubuntu and maximum feasible participation. Finally, we demonstrate how employing the aforementioned frameworks in AI can benefit society by flattening the current top-down social hierarchies as AI is currently being utilized. Implications are discussed. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:36:20Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:99c8da3b-8499-4f83-87b2-35c412476431 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:36:20Z |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publisher | Springer |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:99c8da3b-8499-4f83-87b2-35c4124764312024-09-20T20:05:54ZHuman-centric AI: philosophical and community-centric considerationsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:99c8da3b-8499-4f83-87b2-35c412476431EnglishJisc Publications RouterSpringer2023Taylor, RRO’Dell, BMurphy, JWThis article provides a course of correction in the discourse surrounding human-centric AI by elucidating the philosophical underpinning that serves to create a view that AI is divorced from human-centric values. Next, we espouse the need to explicitly designate stakeholder- or community-centric values which are needed to resolve the issue of alignment. To achieve this, we present two frameworks, Ubuntu and maximum feasible participation. Finally, we demonstrate how employing the aforementioned frameworks in AI can benefit society by flattening the current top-down social hierarchies as AI is currently being utilized. Implications are discussed. |
| spellingShingle | Taylor, RR O’Dell, B Murphy, JW Human-centric AI: philosophical and community-centric considerations |
| title | Human-centric AI: philosophical and community-centric considerations |
| title_full | Human-centric AI: philosophical and community-centric considerations |
| title_fullStr | Human-centric AI: philosophical and community-centric considerations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Human-centric AI: philosophical and community-centric considerations |
| title_short | Human-centric AI: philosophical and community-centric considerations |
| title_sort | human centric ai philosophical and community centric considerations |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT taylorrr humancentricaiphilosophicalandcommunitycentricconsiderations AT odellb humancentricaiphilosophicalandcommunitycentricconsiderations AT murphyjw humancentricaiphilosophicalandcommunitycentricconsiderations |