The development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrix
<p>This paper has two goals. The first is to develop a variety of robust methods for the computation of the Fundamental Matrix, the calibration-free representation of camera motion. The methods are drawn from the principal categories of robust estimators, viz. case deletion diagnostics, M-esti...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer
1997
|
| _version_ | 1811140363981684736 |
|---|---|
| author | Torr, PHS Murray, DW |
| author_facet | Torr, PHS Murray, DW |
| author_sort | Torr, PHS |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <p>This paper has two goals. The first is to develop a variety of robust methods for the computation of the Fundamental Matrix, the calibration-free representation of camera motion. The methods are drawn from the principal categories of robust estimators, viz. case deletion diagnostics, M-estimators and random sampling, and the paper develops the theory required to apply them to non-linear orthogonal regression problems. Although a considerable amount of interest has focussed on the application of robust estimation in computer vision, the relative merits of the many individual methods are unknown, leaving the potential practitioner to guess at their value. The second goal is therefore to compare and judge the methods.</p>
<p>Comparative tests are carried out using correspondences generated both synthetically in a statistically controlled fashion and from feature matching in real imagery. In contrast with previously reported methods the goodness of fit to the synthetic observations is judged not in terms of the fit to the observations per se but in terms of fit to the ground truth. A variety of error measures are examined. The experiments allow a statistically satisfying and quasi-optimal method to be synthesized, which is shown to be stable with up to 50 percent outlier contamination, and may still be used if there are more than 50 percent outliers. Performance bounds are established for the method, and a variety of robust methods to estimate the standard deviation of the error and covariance matrix of the parameters are examined.</p>
<p>The results of the comparison have broad applicability to vision algorithms where the input data are corrupted not only by noise but also by gross outliers.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:20:48Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:9a564859-78fe-4872-99bb-368b5474a363 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:20:48Z |
| publishDate | 1997 |
| publisher | Springer |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:9a564859-78fe-4872-99bb-368b5474a3632024-08-01T13:34:22ZThe development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrixJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:9a564859-78fe-4872-99bb-368b5474a363EnglishSymplectic ElementsSpringer1997Torr, PHSMurray, DW<p>This paper has two goals. The first is to develop a variety of robust methods for the computation of the Fundamental Matrix, the calibration-free representation of camera motion. The methods are drawn from the principal categories of robust estimators, viz. case deletion diagnostics, M-estimators and random sampling, and the paper develops the theory required to apply them to non-linear orthogonal regression problems. Although a considerable amount of interest has focussed on the application of robust estimation in computer vision, the relative merits of the many individual methods are unknown, leaving the potential practitioner to guess at their value. The second goal is therefore to compare and judge the methods.</p> <p>Comparative tests are carried out using correspondences generated both synthetically in a statistically controlled fashion and from feature matching in real imagery. In contrast with previously reported methods the goodness of fit to the synthetic observations is judged not in terms of the fit to the observations per se but in terms of fit to the ground truth. A variety of error measures are examined. The experiments allow a statistically satisfying and quasi-optimal method to be synthesized, which is shown to be stable with up to 50 percent outlier contamination, and may still be used if there are more than 50 percent outliers. Performance bounds are established for the method, and a variety of robust methods to estimate the standard deviation of the error and covariance matrix of the parameters are examined.</p> <p>The results of the comparison have broad applicability to vision algorithms where the input data are corrupted not only by noise but also by gross outliers.</p> |
| spellingShingle | Torr, PHS Murray, DW The development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrix |
| title | The development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrix |
| title_full | The development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrix |
| title_fullStr | The development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrix |
| title_full_unstemmed | The development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrix |
| title_short | The development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrix |
| title_sort | development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrix |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT torrphs thedevelopmentandcomparisonofrobustmethodsforestimatingthefundamentalmatrix AT murraydw thedevelopmentandcomparisonofrobustmethodsforestimatingthefundamentalmatrix AT torrphs developmentandcomparisonofrobustmethodsforestimatingthefundamentalmatrix AT murraydw developmentandcomparisonofrobustmethodsforestimatingthefundamentalmatrix |