Diversification of Hox gene clusters in osteoglossomorph fish in comparison to other teleosts and the spotted gar outgroup

An ancient genome duplication (TGD or 3R) occurred in teleost fish after divergence from the lineage leading to gar. This genome duplication is shared by the three extant teleost lineages: Osteoglossomorpha (bony-tongues), Elopomorpha (eels and tarpons) and Clupeocephala (a large clade including sal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin, K, Holland, P
Format: Journal article
Published: Wiley 2017
_version_ 1797084244639481856
author Martin, K
Holland, P
author_facet Martin, K
Holland, P
author_sort Martin, K
collection OXFORD
description An ancient genome duplication (TGD or 3R) occurred in teleost fish after divergence from the lineage leading to gar. This genome duplication is shared by the three extant teleost lineages: Osteoglossomorpha (bony-tongues), Elopomorpha (eels and tarpons) and Clupeocephala (a large clade including salmon, carp, medaka, zebrafish, cichlids, pufferfish, stickleback and ~26,000 other species). After TGD, different clupeocephalan species retained different gene duplicates; this is seen clearly in Hox gene clusters but extends to all genes. Since divergent resolution of TGD paralogs is a potential driving force for speciation, it is possible this contributed to diversification of this clade. The extent to which divergent resolution of TGD paralogs occurred within Osteoglossomorpha has not been investigated in detail, and Hox cluster organisation has been reported for just two species: Pantodon buchholzi (Pantodontidae) and Scleropages formosus (Osteoglossidae). We applied surveyscale genome sequencing and de novo assembly to three further osteoglossomorph taxa: Osteoglossum bicirrhosum (Osteoglossidae), Chitala ornata (Notopteridae), and Gnathonemus petersii (Mormyridae). We find that each retained more Hox genes than clupeocephalan taxa (excluding those that underwent additional genome duplication), but fewer than eels. Several Hox genes are missing in all teleosts, including duplicates of two Hox genes present in the slow evolving pre-TGD genome of the spotted gar. We find divergent resolution through individual gene losses and whole cluster losses has been rampant across osteoglossomorphs, despite their extant species paucity. We suggest that reciprocal gene loss following TGD were probably insufficient to drive the exceptional diversification of teleosts.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T01:52:43Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:9aacd927-5804-47ef-a262-7c6a8e1f1b8f
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T01:52:43Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:9aacd927-5804-47ef-a262-7c6a8e1f1b8f2022-03-27T00:22:57ZDiversification of Hox gene clusters in osteoglossomorph fish in comparison to other teleosts and the spotted gar outgroupJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:9aacd927-5804-47ef-a262-7c6a8e1f1b8fSymplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2017Martin, KHolland, PAn ancient genome duplication (TGD or 3R) occurred in teleost fish after divergence from the lineage leading to gar. This genome duplication is shared by the three extant teleost lineages: Osteoglossomorpha (bony-tongues), Elopomorpha (eels and tarpons) and Clupeocephala (a large clade including salmon, carp, medaka, zebrafish, cichlids, pufferfish, stickleback and ~26,000 other species). After TGD, different clupeocephalan species retained different gene duplicates; this is seen clearly in Hox gene clusters but extends to all genes. Since divergent resolution of TGD paralogs is a potential driving force for speciation, it is possible this contributed to diversification of this clade. The extent to which divergent resolution of TGD paralogs occurred within Osteoglossomorpha has not been investigated in detail, and Hox cluster organisation has been reported for just two species: Pantodon buchholzi (Pantodontidae) and Scleropages formosus (Osteoglossidae). We applied surveyscale genome sequencing and de novo assembly to three further osteoglossomorph taxa: Osteoglossum bicirrhosum (Osteoglossidae), Chitala ornata (Notopteridae), and Gnathonemus petersii (Mormyridae). We find that each retained more Hox genes than clupeocephalan taxa (excluding those that underwent additional genome duplication), but fewer than eels. Several Hox genes are missing in all teleosts, including duplicates of two Hox genes present in the slow evolving pre-TGD genome of the spotted gar. We find divergent resolution through individual gene losses and whole cluster losses has been rampant across osteoglossomorphs, despite their extant species paucity. We suggest that reciprocal gene loss following TGD were probably insufficient to drive the exceptional diversification of teleosts.
spellingShingle Martin, K
Holland, P
Diversification of Hox gene clusters in osteoglossomorph fish in comparison to other teleosts and the spotted gar outgroup
title Diversification of Hox gene clusters in osteoglossomorph fish in comparison to other teleosts and the spotted gar outgroup
title_full Diversification of Hox gene clusters in osteoglossomorph fish in comparison to other teleosts and the spotted gar outgroup
title_fullStr Diversification of Hox gene clusters in osteoglossomorph fish in comparison to other teleosts and the spotted gar outgroup
title_full_unstemmed Diversification of Hox gene clusters in osteoglossomorph fish in comparison to other teleosts and the spotted gar outgroup
title_short Diversification of Hox gene clusters in osteoglossomorph fish in comparison to other teleosts and the spotted gar outgroup
title_sort diversification of hox gene clusters in osteoglossomorph fish in comparison to other teleosts and the spotted gar outgroup
work_keys_str_mv AT martink diversificationofhoxgeneclustersinosteoglossomorphfishincomparisontootherteleostsandthespottedgaroutgroup
AT hollandp diversificationofhoxgeneclustersinosteoglossomorphfishincomparisontootherteleostsandthespottedgaroutgroup