Structural drivers and social protection: mechanisms of HIV risk and HIV prevention for South African adolescents

<p><strong>Introduction</strong> Social protection is high on the HIV-prevention agenda for youth in sub-Saharan Africa. However, questions remain: How do unconditional cash transfers work? What is the effect of augmenting cash provision with social care? And can “cash plus care” s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cluver, L, Orkin, F, Meinck, F, Boyes, M, Sherr, L
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central 2016
_version_ 1797084276203716608
author Cluver, L
Orkin, F
Meinck, F
Boyes, M
Sherr, L
author_facet Cluver, L
Orkin, F
Meinck, F
Boyes, M
Sherr, L
author_sort Cluver, L
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Introduction</strong> Social protection is high on the HIV-prevention agenda for youth in sub-Saharan Africa. However, questions remain: How do unconditional cash transfers work? What is the effect of augmenting cash provision with social care? And can “cash plus care” social protection reduce risks for adolescents most vulnerable to infection? This study tackles these questions by first identifying mediated pathways to adolescent HIV risks and then examining potential main and moderating effects of social protection in South Africa.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong> This study was a prospective observational study of 3515 10-to-17-year-olds (56.7% female; 96.8% one-year retention). Within randomly selected census areas in four rural and urban districts in two South African provinces, all homes with a resident adolescent were sampled between 2009/2010 and 2011/2012. Measures included 1) potential structural drivers of HIV infection such as poverty and community violence; 2) HIV risk behaviours; 3) hypothesized psychosocial mediating factors; and 4) types of social protection involving cash and care. Using gender-disaggregated analyses, longitudinal mediation models were tested for potential main and moderating effects of social protection.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong> Structural drivers were associated with increased onset of adolescent HIV risk behaviour (p<0.001, B=0.06, SE=0.01), fully mediated by increased psychosocial problems. Both cash and care aspects of social protection were associated with reductions in HIV risk behaviour and psychosocial deprivations. In addition, cash social protection moderated risk pathways: for adolescent girls and boys experiencing more acute structural deprivation, social protection had the greatest associations with HIV risk prevention (e.g. moderation effects for girls: B=−0.08, p<0.002 between structural deprivation and psychosocial problems, and B=−0.07, p<0.001 between psychosocial problems and HIV risk behaviour).</p> <p><strong>Conclusions</strong> Adolescents with the greatest structural deprivation are at higher risk of HIV, but social protection has the greatest prevention effects for the most vulnerable. Social protection comprising unconditional cash plus care was associated with reduced risk pathways through moderation and main effects, respectively. Our findings suggest the importance of social protection within a combination package of HIV-prevention approaches.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T01:53:11Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:9ad3a79d-7802-4559-b309-6ba6429abbc4
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T01:53:11Z
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:9ad3a79d-7802-4559-b309-6ba6429abbc42022-03-27T00:24:11ZStructural drivers and social protection: mechanisms of HIV risk and HIV prevention for South African adolescentsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:9ad3a79d-7802-4559-b309-6ba6429abbc4EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordBioMed Central2016Cluver, LOrkin, FMeinck, FBoyes, MSherr, L<p><strong>Introduction</strong> Social protection is high on the HIV-prevention agenda for youth in sub-Saharan Africa. However, questions remain: How do unconditional cash transfers work? What is the effect of augmenting cash provision with social care? And can “cash plus care” social protection reduce risks for adolescents most vulnerable to infection? This study tackles these questions by first identifying mediated pathways to adolescent HIV risks and then examining potential main and moderating effects of social protection in South Africa.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong> This study was a prospective observational study of 3515 10-to-17-year-olds (56.7% female; 96.8% one-year retention). Within randomly selected census areas in four rural and urban districts in two South African provinces, all homes with a resident adolescent were sampled between 2009/2010 and 2011/2012. Measures included 1) potential structural drivers of HIV infection such as poverty and community violence; 2) HIV risk behaviours; 3) hypothesized psychosocial mediating factors; and 4) types of social protection involving cash and care. Using gender-disaggregated analyses, longitudinal mediation models were tested for potential main and moderating effects of social protection.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong> Structural drivers were associated with increased onset of adolescent HIV risk behaviour (p<0.001, B=0.06, SE=0.01), fully mediated by increased psychosocial problems. Both cash and care aspects of social protection were associated with reductions in HIV risk behaviour and psychosocial deprivations. In addition, cash social protection moderated risk pathways: for adolescent girls and boys experiencing more acute structural deprivation, social protection had the greatest associations with HIV risk prevention (e.g. moderation effects for girls: B=−0.08, p<0.002 between structural deprivation and psychosocial problems, and B=−0.07, p<0.001 between psychosocial problems and HIV risk behaviour).</p> <p><strong>Conclusions</strong> Adolescents with the greatest structural deprivation are at higher risk of HIV, but social protection has the greatest prevention effects for the most vulnerable. Social protection comprising unconditional cash plus care was associated with reduced risk pathways through moderation and main effects, respectively. Our findings suggest the importance of social protection within a combination package of HIV-prevention approaches.</p>
spellingShingle Cluver, L
Orkin, F
Meinck, F
Boyes, M
Sherr, L
Structural drivers and social protection: mechanisms of HIV risk and HIV prevention for South African adolescents
title Structural drivers and social protection: mechanisms of HIV risk and HIV prevention for South African adolescents
title_full Structural drivers and social protection: mechanisms of HIV risk and HIV prevention for South African adolescents
title_fullStr Structural drivers and social protection: mechanisms of HIV risk and HIV prevention for South African adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Structural drivers and social protection: mechanisms of HIV risk and HIV prevention for South African adolescents
title_short Structural drivers and social protection: mechanisms of HIV risk and HIV prevention for South African adolescents
title_sort structural drivers and social protection mechanisms of hiv risk and hiv prevention for south african adolescents
work_keys_str_mv AT cluverl structuraldriversandsocialprotectionmechanismsofhivriskandhivpreventionforsouthafricanadolescents
AT orkinf structuraldriversandsocialprotectionmechanismsofhivriskandhivpreventionforsouthafricanadolescents
AT meinckf structuraldriversandsocialprotectionmechanismsofhivriskandhivpreventionforsouthafricanadolescents
AT boyesm structuraldriversandsocialprotectionmechanismsofhivriskandhivpreventionforsouthafricanadolescents
AT sherrl structuraldriversandsocialprotectionmechanismsofhivriskandhivpreventionforsouthafricanadolescents