An edition with commentary of the Batrachomyomachia

<p>The thesis consists of three main sections: the Introduction, the text (with apparatus), and the Commentary.</p> <p>The Introduction begins with a survey of the available evidence for the poem’s date and authorship, before moving on to consider its generic affiliations and influ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hosty, M
Other Authors: Kelly, A
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
_version_ 1826309697086423040
author Hosty, M
author2 Kelly, A
author_facet Kelly, A
Hosty, M
author_sort Hosty, M
collection OXFORD
description <p>The thesis consists of three main sections: the Introduction, the text (with apparatus), and the Commentary.</p> <p>The Introduction begins with a survey of the available evidence for the poem’s date and authorship, before moving on to consider its generic affiliations and influences, focusing on two particular areas: its links with the ill-defined genre of παρῳδία, and its relationship to animal-narratives elsewhere in ancient literature (particularly fable) and visual art. This is followed by a detailed analysis of the poem’s style and metre, a brief tour of its <em>Nachleben</em> up to the 13th century, and a summary of the notoriously tangled manuscript tradition.</p> <p>The text is new, and differs substantially from both that of Allen (in the OCT) and of West (the most recent English edition). The apparatus, as explained in more detail on p. 117, is somewhere between the two: it takes into account the readings of only nine MSS from the 80-100 extant, and does not attempt to represent every single textual variation even among these nine, but it is much fuller than the minimalist apparatus of the Loeb. It aims to provide a useful source for scholars interested in the poem’s many and serious textual cruces, while remaining more succinct and user-friendly than the dense and sometimes baffling apparatus of Ludwich’s monumental 1896 edition. The text is followed by an English prose translation: this makes no claims to beauty, and is simply intended as a relatively literal guide to the sense of the Greek.</p> <p>The Commentary, finally, is twofold. Any commentary on the <em>Batrachomyomachia</em> will inevitably spend much space and ink on purely textual issues, and on the fundamental task of unearthing meaning from the dizzying range of wild and nonsensical variants available. Interspersed with these textual points, however, this commentary includes considerations of the poem not as a mechanics problem but as a sophisticated Hellenistic work of art – exploring its intertextualities, its characterisation, its dramatic effects, its dry sense of humour, and subjecting it to the serious literary analysis it has often been denied.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:39:36Z
format Thesis
id oxford-uuid:9af478b9-771d-4a9f-94ed-8cf6bc7d7cd2
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:39:36Z
publishDate 2013
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:9af478b9-771d-4a9f-94ed-8cf6bc7d7cd22023-04-04T15:27:55ZAn edition with commentary of the BatrachomyomachiaThesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:9af478b9-771d-4a9f-94ed-8cf6bc7d7cd2Hellenic (Classical Greek) literatureClassical GreekEnglishOxford University Research Archive - Valet2013Hosty, MKelly, A<p>The thesis consists of three main sections: the Introduction, the text (with apparatus), and the Commentary.</p> <p>The Introduction begins with a survey of the available evidence for the poem’s date and authorship, before moving on to consider its generic affiliations and influences, focusing on two particular areas: its links with the ill-defined genre of παρῳδία, and its relationship to animal-narratives elsewhere in ancient literature (particularly fable) and visual art. This is followed by a detailed analysis of the poem’s style and metre, a brief tour of its <em>Nachleben</em> up to the 13th century, and a summary of the notoriously tangled manuscript tradition.</p> <p>The text is new, and differs substantially from both that of Allen (in the OCT) and of West (the most recent English edition). The apparatus, as explained in more detail on p. 117, is somewhere between the two: it takes into account the readings of only nine MSS from the 80-100 extant, and does not attempt to represent every single textual variation even among these nine, but it is much fuller than the minimalist apparatus of the Loeb. It aims to provide a useful source for scholars interested in the poem’s many and serious textual cruces, while remaining more succinct and user-friendly than the dense and sometimes baffling apparatus of Ludwich’s monumental 1896 edition. The text is followed by an English prose translation: this makes no claims to beauty, and is simply intended as a relatively literal guide to the sense of the Greek.</p> <p>The Commentary, finally, is twofold. Any commentary on the <em>Batrachomyomachia</em> will inevitably spend much space and ink on purely textual issues, and on the fundamental task of unearthing meaning from the dizzying range of wild and nonsensical variants available. Interspersed with these textual points, however, this commentary includes considerations of the poem not as a mechanics problem but as a sophisticated Hellenistic work of art – exploring its intertextualities, its characterisation, its dramatic effects, its dry sense of humour, and subjecting it to the serious literary analysis it has often been denied.</p>
spellingShingle Hellenic (Classical Greek) literature
Classical Greek
Hosty, M
An edition with commentary of the Batrachomyomachia
title An edition with commentary of the Batrachomyomachia
title_full An edition with commentary of the Batrachomyomachia
title_fullStr An edition with commentary of the Batrachomyomachia
title_full_unstemmed An edition with commentary of the Batrachomyomachia
title_short An edition with commentary of the Batrachomyomachia
title_sort edition with commentary of the batrachomyomachia
topic Hellenic (Classical Greek) literature
Classical Greek
work_keys_str_mv AT hostym aneditionwithcommentaryofthebatrachomyomachia
AT hostym editionwithcommentaryofthebatrachomyomachia