Pushing (and pulling) the boundaries of emotion regulation

This commentary addresses Gross’s formulation of emotion regulation and its limits. According to his definition, emotion regulation covers a heterogeneous variety of cognitive and behavioral operations, some of which share important features with processes falling outside the specified conceptual d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Parkinson, B
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Routledge 2015
_version_ 1826311854668906496
author Parkinson, B
author_facet Parkinson, B
author_sort Parkinson, B
collection OXFORD
description This commentary addresses Gross’s formulation of emotion regulation and its limits. According to his definition, emotion regulation covers a heterogeneous variety of cognitive and behavioral operations, some of which share important features with processes falling outside the specified conceptual domain, leading to possible boundary disputes. Further, Gross’s extended process model (EPM) excludes some forms of co-regulation whose investigation may clarify the operation of intrapsychic regulation. EPM helps to distinguish different regulatory targets and functions, but understanding underlying processes may require tighter and more focused distinctions.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:17:27Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:9bba3ad3-97f3-492b-add1-9c450cfb3d47
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T08:17:27Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Routledge
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:9bba3ad3-97f3-492b-add1-9c450cfb3d472024-01-11T15:06:25ZPushing (and pulling) the boundaries of emotion regulationJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:9bba3ad3-97f3-492b-add1-9c450cfb3d47EnglishORA DepositRoutledge2015Parkinson, BThis commentary addresses Gross’s formulation of emotion regulation and its limits. According to his definition, emotion regulation covers a heterogeneous variety of cognitive and behavioral operations, some of which share important features with processes falling outside the specified conceptual domain, leading to possible boundary disputes. Further, Gross’s extended process model (EPM) excludes some forms of co-regulation whose investigation may clarify the operation of intrapsychic regulation. EPM helps to distinguish different regulatory targets and functions, but understanding underlying processes may require tighter and more focused distinctions.
spellingShingle Parkinson, B
Pushing (and pulling) the boundaries of emotion regulation
title Pushing (and pulling) the boundaries of emotion regulation
title_full Pushing (and pulling) the boundaries of emotion regulation
title_fullStr Pushing (and pulling) the boundaries of emotion regulation
title_full_unstemmed Pushing (and pulling) the boundaries of emotion regulation
title_short Pushing (and pulling) the boundaries of emotion regulation
title_sort pushing and pulling the boundaries of emotion regulation
work_keys_str_mv AT parkinsonb pushingandpullingtheboundariesofemotionregulation