Counterfactuals in “agreeing to disagree” type results
Moses and Nachum (1990) identified conceptual flaws (later echoed by Samet, 2010) in Bacharach's (1985) generalization of Aumann's (1976) seminal “agreeing to disagree” result by demonstrating that the crucial assumptions of like-mindedness and the Sure-Thing Principle are not meaningfully...
Main Author: | Tarbush, B |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Similar Items
-
Agreed and disagreed uncertainty
by: Gambetti, L, et al.
Published: (2023) -
The double crux : disagreeing to agree
by: You, Sze Yee
Published: (2019) -
In Favour of Medical Dissensus: Why We Should Agree to Disagree About End-of-Life Decisions.
by: Wilkinson, D, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Hard to Disagree, Mostly
by: Whittington, R, et al.
Published: (2008) -
When scientists disagree
by: Blundell, SJ
Published: (2023)